Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akash soukhee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedied following page blanking by author. Peridon (talk) 18:38, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Akash soukhee[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiographical article claiming notability as a Mauritian model who has appeared on the cover of Vogue, but no verification can be found for this or any other claims of notability, other than unreliable self-published sites. Images available of Soukhee as a Vogue cover model appear to be self-created photo-shop fakes. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Apparently, this is not the first time down this path for this article. I suspect WP:CSD#G4 applies. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as G4 - As one of the voters at the first nomination, it was clear that this was a hoax probably started by the subject themselves. As a result of this, I have warned them at their talk page. SwisterTwister talk 20:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looked at it and thought I'd deleted it too. Must be wishful thinking... I've removed the speedy tag as it was not actually deleted at AfD. It was speedied while at AfD, so I feel G4 does not apply. If anyone finds a contrary opinion, I won't rush to DRV. I wish the lad luck, and won't oppose when there's a real showing of notability (and an improvement in the grammar in the references...). I wish the lad luck - making a success at modelling is harder than the writing or music businesses. Luck and being in the right place at the right time - or possibly being in the wrong place at the right time, which can be more noticeable. Peridon (talk) 22:35, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article's author has blanked the page. Could this be considered a WP:CSD#G7 speedy deletion candidate at this point? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.