Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad J. Naous
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Ahmad J. Naous[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ahmad J. Naous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PROF. It's a bit hard because the critieria mention the subject's "discipline" and stratetxology is not a conventional discipline (like chemistry or English literature). Most of the sources appear to be interview puff pieces. The article was not ready for mainspace, but the author insisted it be moved from draft space. Bbb23 (talk) 02:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Economics, and Lebanon. Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing for WP:PROF; I think "their scholarly discipline, broadly construed" suggests we should look at the discipline of "business". Nothing for WP:NAUTHOR; only one book and I can't turn up any RS reviews for it. I haven't found a single source that looks like solid WP:GNG coverage. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Notability very distant. Xxanthippe (talk).
- Delete: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Maliner (talk) 04:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Making up a word and then calling yourself an expert in it is not by itself enough for notability, but we seem to have nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, WP:G5. Aintabli (talk) 03:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Search for sources to see the possibility of him passing WP:BASIC but couldn't find any.Wasilatlovekesy (talk) 07:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.