Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agustín Fiorilli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 00:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agustín Fiorilli[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sole source provided so far does not mention him significantly, rather in passing (as someone who was just from somewhere). The proposed garden covers all Argentine olympians. Competing and nothing more does not earn you a pass on the GNG. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Argentina. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:16, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not saying he's notable, but User:InvadingInvader deserves a WP:TROUT for trying to A7 speedy this two-time Olympian. Someone with your experience should know better... BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I deserve it – I should have prodded or AfD'd first. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A Darius Dhlomo article. Had forgot about him. Darius Dhlomo, Sander.v.Ginkel and Lugnuts - there's a trio for the history books.
That being said I found this good piece as well as this interview-heavy piece, this more-than-passing report on a swimming event and this report on a relay record (that has since been beat). We get several details, such as Fiorilli's nickname being Rana, he was offered a berth at CA River Plate, etc. Also, Pablo Abal told about being offered scholarships in the US. For a 1996 swimmer, coverage would have been off the (current) internet. Geschichte (talk) 18:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 17:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since I think it should not be soft deleted, weak keep per above. Geschichte (talk) 08:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per the sources found above. Seacactus 13 (talk) 15:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - good sourcing from User:Geschichte. Llajwa (talk) 18:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's much better sourced than many similar articles here. Also, some kind of a record could be taken in account. Better Nuncio (talk) 08:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.