Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agapiméno Mou Gardoúmpi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 11:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agapiméno Mou Gardoúmpi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly unremarkable addition, no charts. The artist doesn't even have an article. Jennica✿ / ^talk 23:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: - There *was* an article on the artist himself ("Dispero Ras Siento"), but this was deleted following an AfD discussion on the grounds of insufficiently-demonstrated notability. I had planned on letting that run its course before nominating any associated articles (e.g. this one), which has now happened.

I would support delete here for exactly the same reasons- no clear independent demonstration of notability. There are plenty of "sources", but as per the artist article discussion, it's not clear who wrote and/or supplied the content in those sources originally- i.e. not clearly independent or reliable- were they created by an independent writer or someone associated with the artist? Also, this article appears to be copied at least in part from them (e.g. "the video clip which was included had the title" originally appears at the cited Last.FM article).

We should also be considering other articles associated with the artist on the same grounds. Ubcule (talk) 17:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.