Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelleda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 20:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adelleda[edit]

Hoax. Duffbeerforme (talk) 09:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are part of the hoax:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:26, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax, as nominated, and one of the most extensive ones I've ever seen. There are hits at http://www.lyricsmania.com, lyricsmode.com, http://www.911tabs.com, etc. Someone has gone to a lot of work on this one. But the artist's name does NOT show up in the RIAA's searchable database, so if they DO exist, they have NOT been certified Gold as claimed in the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as unverifiable. -- Whpq (talk) 17:47, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
quack already
Delete It's all a load of rubbish: while the band may exist, they certainly have not charted or gained the gushing reviews that the author says they have. The one link the back the article up leads to the RIAA's database on a totally different artist! It's a very good hoax, but seriously, why bother? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.154.130.188 (talk) 08:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a possible hoax. Can find nothing to back up any of the claims that are made. Nothing at Sony BMG or EMI sites. Nothing at RIAA to back up the gold record claims. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 22:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.