Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actor Studio India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Absolutely no interest here. I'm boldly treating it as a successful WP:PROD — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actor Studio India[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional piece, for a non notable studio, a search for reliable secondary sources comes up empty. The one reference to the CityPlus article is not enough to make it pass WP:CORP, the other ref is about the person, not the corporation. $Erebus Morgaine (Talk)$ 16:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: article has been recreated after being deleted on Feb. 26

Erebus Morgaine (Talk)

16:56, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look on recent association links and other workshop links . There you can see that it has trained some of the biggest and well known institues ,beauty pagents and colleges etc . Secondly it comes under educational institution. And you have a different guidelines for it . Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.89.32.170 (talk) 05:41, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 11:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.