Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:54, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actix[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One giant advertisement for a company of questionable notability Prof. Squirrel (talk) 16:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 18:14, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I don't believe this has enough reliable secondary sources to pass notability guidelines. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable: all google hits seem to be fairly old, making the industry leader claim suspect. In addition its borderline spam and completely unintelligable.TheLongTone (talk) 21:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.