Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abigail Seldin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I don't think it's worth it to relist a third time. General consensus is that this subject has received significant coverage by multiple reliable sources and meets WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 05:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abigail Seldin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable as individual entry. Sources are trivial mention. Listing on forbes 30 under 30 is not the onlyonly criteria for notability I think. It is wrtitten as an advertisement of CV only. Can be redirected to her organisation College abacus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebellion65 (talk • contribs) 09:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not sure why this was marked for deletion. Subject is the topic of numerous articles in mainstream media (The New York Times, The Washington Post), and sold a software company that is separately the subject of numerous articles in mainstream media and reputable trade publications (CNN, The Chronicle of Higher Education, The Wall Street Journal). — Preceding unsigned comment added by A112484011388 (talk • contribs) 12:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion was not previously transcluded in the main deletion list; I just added it. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businesswoman. The "30 under 30" listing from Forbes is more like a sign that she may at some point become notable than that she already is.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep* WSJ, NYT, Huff post, Forbes are not the forums that cover a subject without a decent achievment. Also, She sounds like a promissing success story. If it sound like she will be more notable in near future than why not now. the subject have media coverage, necessary for credibility. I vote "Let it stay". AleksandarVicky (talk) 11:13, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 04:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Wow, how is this a question? She's been featured in the Washington Post. Being listed in Forbes' "30 Under 30" absolutely is a notability-conferring source. Definitely demonstrated notability with existing sources. — Toughpigs (talk) 06:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In-depth articles about her in The New York Times and The Philadelphia Inquirer, both high-quality sources. Narky Blert (talk) 10:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.