Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Kumar Amber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:50, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Kumar Amber[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable poet. The sources, composed as they are of blogs and tabloids, do not meet WP:RS. They are therefore unable to support the claims of notability made: fails WP:GNG. The subject is not 'regarded as an important figure' and neither 'is widely cited by peers or successors'; he is not 'known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique'; and has not created 'a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.' Fails WP:NAUTHOR. _Muffled ^Pocketed 08:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek kumar Amber is a famous indian hindi literature poet. his name is also added in Rashtriy kavi Sangam's directory which is national list of indian poets. His poems has published in many newspapers and magazines of india. Amber's poetry has also published in many online magazines like Hindi Kavita, Sahitya manjari , Swarg Vibha, Hindi Sahitya kavya Sankalan, Rachnakar, Hindi satire, Sahityapedia-Encyclopedia of hindi literature, Literature in india, Saavn.in. his poems has also published in bharat darshan which publish from New zeland, Anubhuti which publish from United States of Emirate. he is called the poet of love. He has also awarded by many awards like Anjuman-Farog-e-Urdu Award and Sahitya shri etc. His new poetry book will be publish soon. Arunim005 (talk) 11:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Previously submitted unsuccessfully by User:Abhishek Kumar Amber who was still trying to place the subject's name on Wikipedia until less than half an hour prior to the start of similar activity by the current WP:SPA editor. However the question here is whether any notability can be demonstrated. Notability is not inherited from having performed alongside others and, as the nomination says, the references look poor, with blogs and user-submitted sites. However it would be good if these and the awards claimed above could be evaluated by someone from Wikiproject India? AllyD (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Subject apparently fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. Almost all cited sources in the article are user-generated contents, and are thus unreliable and useless to write an encyclopedia article.

If it's an autobiography (what it seems to be); I would suggest author to promote himself on his blog. Wikipedia is not a place to be famous.Anup [Talk] 20:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Read the article. This is a sixteen year old "poet". Bearian (talk) 00:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not yet a notable poet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic Nightfury 07:39, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.