Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Henry (American football)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Henry (American football)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just routine coverage, nothing in-depth enough to pass WP:GNG or WP:NSPORTS. Was deprodded with the addition of single source of short, routine sports coverage. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football, and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 21:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He is a big ten coordinator, besides him being first team all big ten and playing a bit in the nfl makes him notable.

Comment - none of those things passes GNG or NSPORTS.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GNG / SIGCOV. E.g., this (part one/part two), this (part 1/part 2), this, this, this, this, this, this. Cbl62 (talk) 00:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sourcing provided by Cbl62. Jweiss11 (talk) 01:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly notable having passed WP:GNG with ample sourcing from a variety of sources.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources provided by Cbl62. Clear pass of WP:GNG. Frank Anchor 03:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep User talk:Cbowers77 07:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per Cbl62's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 11:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - obvious GNG pass. Rlendog (talk) 16:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : Satisfying WP:NFOOTY. Tictictoc (talk) 16:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Cbl62. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 22:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG.HennSw123 (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.