Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Lick of the Old Cassette Box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Discuss possible merge; discussion is against deletion. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Lick of the Old Cassette Box[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication of notability. Unsourced, unreleased album with a claim it will be released as part of a re-release of another album. Google searches find practically nothing about it. noq (talk) 19:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now, there's no sense to rush to delete it if it could be notable within a couple of weeks. I have no prejudice against renominating in September or so if it is completely ignored, but the band's last five albums have charted, so I doubt that that will happen. Anyways, let's wait and see. Dea db eef 21:33, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL would seem to apply to that argument. And this is not going to be a standalone album but additional tracks on a re-release of another album. noq (talk) 11:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The release is confirmed. Let's see if coverage emerges over the next few weeks that would allow this to be expanded, or whether a merge elsewhere would be in order. --Michig (talk) 07:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - fixed links to Industrial music. ```Buster Seven Talk 18:34, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dos Dedos Mis Amigos. This album is not notable, it lacks coverage. It is not a standalone album, it is being included as part of that other album. That it might get coverage is WP:CRYSTAL and even if it does its likely the coverage would be in the context of it being part of the Dos Dedos reissue. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would have no objection to a merge to Dos Dedos Mis Amigos. A redirect there without any mention of it in that article would not make sense. It is a standalone album as it will be released on its own on vinyl. WP:CRYSTAL is all about details of unverified future events in articles, not editors' opinions in discussions. --Michig (talk) 05:54, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge would be ok, but leave out the sources and the bad dates. The only sources in the articles are sales pages which should not be used. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.