Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARITH Symposium on Computer Arithmetic (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While this appears to be a borderline case, there does seem to be enough consensus, given the lack of participation after the 2nd relist, to say that this should be kept. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ARITH Symposium on Computer Arithmetic[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of independant coverage to make it notable as a standalone article. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. As usual, the difficulty here was at least in part that there are so many publications that mention this conference to cite a paper in it that it made it very difficult to find material about the conference itself. But I have added three testimonials to its importance (not very detailed, but all published independently of IEEE) together with a chronology of its first 16 years that was published by IEEE. It is an old, well-established conference in an area that is also maybe a little old-fashioned but still important for computing infrastructure. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Kadzi   (talk) 13:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per the above. Minus the table, it could be merged into IEEE Computer Society, but I don't think keeping a separate article on it would be bad for the encyclopedia. XOR'easter (talk) 23:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep for the same reasons as above. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 08:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.