Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AJAX Service Bus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AJAX Service Bus[edit]

AJAX Service Bus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not certain the subject of this article exists, and the article certainly doesn't help me to understand what the subject is supposed to be ... —SamB (talk) 20:50, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, multiple issues, no references since 2006, whatever this tried to be is long dead. –Be..anyone (talk) 04:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Be..anyone (talk) 04:27, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. It appears that the AJAX Service Bus's only mention in a reliable source was here in an October 2006 issue of Computerworld, around the time of the article's creation. The brief mention, in an apparently promotional piece, describes the AJAX Service Bus as a feature on a coming software release from "JackBe Corp." Several of the article creator's other edits also relate to this company, including the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Enterprise Application, which was deleted as a copyvio of the JackBe website. This article looks like a strange and nearly incoherent attempt to use Wikipedia to promote a product that never took off. Strictly speaking, it is not a hoax, but it fails WP:N and several applications of WP:NOT, so the recommendation would be Delete. Calamondin12 (talk) 01:22, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Several News searches found nothing and only a Books search found some links including this which reads very similar. Nothing to show the use was widespread or recent. SwisterTwister talk 04:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.