Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.G.R.M Higher Secondary School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Alappuzha district#Education. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A.G.R.M Higher Secondary School[edit]

A.G.R.M Higher Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article only has one source which is a list and needs citations for verification. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 13:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The school doesn't actually seem to be mentioned in the list that is cited as a source, unless I am missing something? Cordless Larry (talk) 17:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as failing our notability guidelines (and the requirement for verifiability, of anything beyond the school's name and location). I haven't even been able to find a source that explains what AGRM stands for, let alone base an article on. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Though all secondary schools should at least potentially be considered notable, that does not mean they necessarily need a separate article when there is this little material. DGG ( talk ) 00:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete It is time to stop assuming that just because a school educates people ages 14-18 or so, it is notable. That is just not a logical idea. I know of enough K-12 or pre-K to 12 charter schools in Metro Detroit that have never been noted in any reliable source ever to not buy this notion that all secondary schools should be presumed notable. There are no sources that show notability. It is time to stop keeping articles based on a supposed consensus to keep articles, and start keeping them based on the sources that actual exist, or in cases like this do not exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect to Alappuzha district#Education. Even if things aren't notable enough for their own articles, they can be covered elsewhere. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:44, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.