Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Formula E season

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus that this is really WP:TOOSOON. SoWhy 16:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2019–20 Formula E season[edit]

2019–20 Formula E season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:TOOSOON. Sports season that is still two years away. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: although it is two years away, the arrival of Porsche and Mercedes is significant. Porsche will discontinue the Porsche 919 Hybrid project—which uses hybrid technology—from the World Endurance Championship; with Audi having already left, Toyota is the only manufacturer in the WEC, so the full consequences of Porsche's defection to Formula E remain to be seen. Likewise, Mercedes compete in Formula 1, which also uses hybrid technology, and while they are committed to the series (for now), their announcement comes at a time when Formula 1 is negotiating the 2021 engine regulations. All of this has triggered a wider discussion about what the future of motorsport is going to look like as Formula E is becoming manufacters' preferred test bed, especially in light of announcements from the French and British governments that they will ban cars with combustion engines in the next few decades. The bottom line is that while it might be very early to create the article, it's incredibly significant in the context of global motorsport. As a precedent, the 2014 Formula One season article was created two years in advance of the season as the regulation changes that were introduced for 2014 were a massive overhaul of the engine formula. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 03:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: if you're not going to bother reading my comment and instead dismiss it as "whatever", why are you taking part in this discussion? Prisonermonkeys (talk) 05:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:36, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Some may say that it would be too soon and immientaly say delete but with the mention of Porsche and Mercedes coming in, this could easily change the tides of Formula E. So I am going to side with User:Prisonermonkeys on this one. Matt294069 is coming 02:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.