Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 BRD Bucharest Open – Singles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 BRD Bucharest Open – Singles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sprawling sports stats article fails WP:NOTSTATS. No evidence of independent notability. Content could be summarized in the main article. - Mr X 14:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep for now. This article has updated as it is an international (minor) tennis event held by WTA. ApprenticeFan ^work 15:21, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Meets WP:NTENNIS. All WTA tour events have separate draw articles, and this would be one of them. Might seem empty but that is because tournament starts Monday. Adamtt9 (talk) 03:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NTENNIS is a notabilty guideline for tennis players, not competitions.- Mr X 11:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – This would be a first... (Gabinho^>:) 06:00, 15 July 2017 (UTC))[reply]
Speedy Keep - Per project notability guidelines [1] and the consensus on there being draw articles[2]. In addition passes WP:NOTSTATS, which states: "Where statistics are so lengthy as to impede the readability of the article, the statistics can be split into a separate article and summarized in the main article." This is the separate article in question, and the main article will summarize the singles info. El Pharao (talk) 11:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As it says on the top of the page that you linked: "This WikiProject advice page is not a formal Wikipedia policy or guideline and may not represent Wikipedia community standards of practice.". - Mr X 11:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that bud, but you're seeing Wikipedia community standards of practice in action right here. El Pharao (talk) 17:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per all of the above. Lepricavark (talk) 03:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I agree with others, meets WP:NTENNIS. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – As above. By the way, do we need to delete every tennis draw? It doesn't make any sense. 333 -blue 04:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Important and good article — Preceding unsigned comment added by M9154 (talk • contribs) 11:11, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets the guideline for tennis tournaments. Coderzombie (talk) 09:31, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Many discussions have established strong consensus for ATP and WTA draw articles. Supported by Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines#Tournament. Hundreds of sources always exist after the event but if the article only lists the results then an official link to the draw is sufficient to reference the content. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Really nothing has to said about this. Matt294069 is coming 11:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.