Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Rugby League State of Origin series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article is a crystal ball violation at this time. Davewild (talk) 21:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Rugby League State of Origin series[edit]

The 2008 State of Origin series concluded two days ago, and it is too early to predict anything about the 2009 series. As such, this article should be deleted as it is clearly crystal ball gazing and not be re-created until some things are actually known about next year's series. Nick Dowling (talk) 10:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Nick Dowling (talk) 10:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —Nick Dowling (talk) 10:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The lead says it all; The 2008 series will be the 28th in its history, With Queensland having won thirteen and New South Wales won twelve series this will be a crucial series. When we can have more on the games than "TBD" it should be recreated, until then it should remain deleted. Five Years 17:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. We know nothing at all about the series: Where the games will be played, when the games will be played, who will be playing for the various teams, etc. The only content is editorial anyway; it is not our place to label series as "crucial". -- Mattinbgn\^talk 01:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. WP:Crystal •Florrie•leave a note• 03:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, too soon, I think. It's a certainty that it will be played, but there is no other concrete information available yet. As such, would appear to fail WP:CRYSTAL. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - I know this competition is likely to go ahead, but it is too soon and therefore fails WP:CRYSTAL, especially seeing as though no dates have been confirmed. Sunderland06 (talk) 15:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.