Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1905–06 Colgate men's basketball team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against a batch nomination. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1905–06 Colgate men's basketball team[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This team isn't particularly notable, there isn't a lot of information available for the team in the early 1900s beyond a list of statistics, and if this is even encyclopedic, it could probably be grouped into a larger article by head coach or decade. There is a long list of red-linked seasons for this team that do not each need an article. Natureium (talk) 21:13, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 22:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane ^talk 02:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's a navbox at the bottom with many similar articles. Deleting one and not the others is not a good idea, and deleting a bunch of articles would need more substantial discussion. Essentially, on its own merits, I don't think it meets the GNG, but I would rather we keep it until a wider discussion can be had on all articles similar to it for consistency's sake. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɻɪbz] 09:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.