Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ମାଧବ ଚନ୍ଦ୍ର ଜେନା

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed by Whpq (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Content not in English. Obvious duplication of Madhab Chandra Jena (AfD discussion), Draft:Madhab Chandra Jena, and even Wikipedia:Madhab Chandra Jena at one point. Uncle G (talk) 14:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)‎[reply]

ମାଧବ ଚନ୍ଦ୍ର ଜେନା[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP (single ref is a dead Google link, so BLP PROD would be rejected), fails GNG and NBIO. BEFORE showed nothing from WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth. WP:BLP requires strong sourcing. Could not find a matching article on other Wikipedias, so ineligeble for CSD A2 (link in Language section states the article does not exist). I considered A7 but decided AfD would be more appropriate because of the duplicate articles and SPI issue (see below).

A machine translation would still be an unsourced or improperly sourced BLP.

Editor has created an English version which has also been nom for deletion by @FatCat96: at Madhab Chandra Jena.

Finally see SPIs at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena#Suspected sockpuppets and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena/Archive for info.

Because of the above info in SPI, request SALT after deletion for both article titles. // Timothy :: talk 05:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Odisha. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: Non English. Why isn't there a CSD category? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:47, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:A2 needs revising, right now its not very helpful. (PS: Hope your doing well Tim) // Timothy :: talk 07:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omkrishnajena 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly check the authentication of the page before deletion.It should not be discrimnated based on emotions like it is being created in English or any other language,suckpuppet etc. it should be fact based. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banambar (talk • contribs) 07:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- There is nothing emotional about wanting articles in the English Wikipedia to be in English. Even if it were written in a language I could read (French, Spanish or Portuguese) I would still vote for deletion. Athel cb (talk) 10:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If any edit or revision required kindly suggest or contribute how to improve the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banambar (talk • contribs) 07:29, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as A10, a duplicate of Madhab Chandra Jena, just in a different language. --Belbury (talk) 07:47, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. This appears to be written in Oriya, and has no place in the English Wikipedia. Athel cb (talk) 10:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.