Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 16[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 16, 2022.

Saintt Woolos Hospital[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo. Was created in error back in 2010 as a result of a page move which was immediately reverted. CycloneYoris talk! 23:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jenna Talia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable sources found for this nickname (a pun on "genitalia"). Google search turns up various performers, no obvious primary topic. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC) Striking "delete" !vote. 19:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, no reliable sources, all seem to be WP:CIRCULAR, IMDb and unreliable tabloids. There's one source that says the stage name is for an actress named Alana, so it's plausible, but doesn't have a last name. Maybe the editor who created the redirect has a source? Bonoahx (talk) 23:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have since found the nickname confirmed in this article in GQ, whose author apparently interviewed Evans. It's just a passing mention, though. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:39, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Abstain as redirect creator. When I added this redirect back in December 2009, the page Alana Evans looked like this, with an uncited claim that she had used the name "Jenna Talia" in two films but hated it so much she switched back to Alana Evans. I'm not the one who added that claim, I merely created a redirect on the basis of it. I don't care if the redirect is deleted or not. (Frankly I'm surprised this name wasn't snatched up by a drag queen decades ago.) —Mahāgaja · talk 07:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It has been: https://www.queensofthecastro.com/projects --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 16:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heliogabale[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 23#Heliogabale

Duopolio di Stakelberg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; no affinity to Italian. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sofisti[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; no affinity to Slavic languages. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sophistik[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; no affinity to German. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Funktionen[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; no affinity to German. Also, this can as well refer to other functions in that language. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pesquisa Operacional[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RLOTE; no affinity to Spanish. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

St Andrew's flag[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Saltire#Heraldry and vexillology or disambiguate. Not only Flag of Scotland is called 'St Andrew's flag', the Russian Navy ensign and some other flags also called as 'St Andrew's flag'. Thesmp (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Top radio[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 23#Top radio

Moldavian Republic[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Moldova (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Moldova. That is what most of the people expected to see when they type 'Moldavian Republic'. Moldavian Democratic Republic can be accessed via Moldova (disambiguation) in hatnote. Thesmp (talk) 21:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. Support deletion as creator of the redirect. I don't know why did I not think about the existance of the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic when I made it, which makes the redirect ambiguous. Also, we need to make the distinction between the historical demonym "Moldavian" and the commonly used one nowadays "Moldovan". An alternate name for the Republic of Moldova is not Republic of Moldavia. Super Ψ Dro 21:15, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's then ambiguous too. A better target for both (instead of deletion for any of the two) could be Moldova (disambiguation). The page is also a disambiguation for Moldavia. Super Ψ Dro 21:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

My Name is Billa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) eviolite (talk) 00:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are three film songs with the same title (1980, 2007, and 2009). The first two are versions of the same song while the third is a different one. Propose to disambiguate as there is no WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT for the title. Ab207 (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

MOS:GROCER[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As a redirect pointing incorrectly to a manual section that talks about apostrophes in acronyms. Jay (talk) 03:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not clear why GROCER is a good shortcut for the target. If deleted, the shortcut link added at the target should be removed as well. signed, Rosguill talk 19:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep (as creator) - the shortcut refers to a common name for this use of punctuation, "grocer's apostrophe". Ibadibam (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Seems obvious enough to me. Grocer's (grocers'?) apostrophes are well known and the section tells us not to use them (although not by name). pburka (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – a most useful shortcut in edit summaries when such mistakes are corrected in articles. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:52, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Greengrocer’s apostrophe refers to unambiguously incorrect formulations like "2 banana's for $20". The use of apostrophes in plurals of acronyms has a different and more nuanced history. The target section of the MOS links to Apostrophe § Abbreviations by way of explanation, not Apostrophe § Superfluous apostrophes ("greengrocers' apostrophes"). The use of this shortcut for the target advice is likely to cause more confusion than clarity.--Trystan (talk) 13:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It's a non-sequiter that's certainly a puzzler to some people reading Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Plural forms and seeing it as an incoming link, since per Trystan above it's a mistaken reference to the greengrocer’s apostrophe, where people get confused between plural s and possessive s, and which is an entirely different thing than deciding whether to use apostrophes for acronyms.
The so-called greengrocers apostrophe ("apostrophe's" etc as a plural) is simply a basic grammatical error and needs no rule and no redirect, anymore than other simple errors such as "sheeps" or "thruway" or "got arrested" etc. need rules and redirects. You just correct them.
The redirect is also vaguely insulting by the way. I still do a little mental stutter-step when writing "its" vs "it's". Sometimes I might get it wrong. I would be proud to be thereby mistaken for a grocer (an honorable and necessary profession), but actual grocers might not take so well to being used as a metaphor for illiteracy. Herostratus (talk) 13:49, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. That specific portion of the MOS refers to plurals of abbreviations, which are not greengrocers' apostrophes. Per Trystan above, apostrophes in plurals of abbreviations differ from apostrophes in plurals of typical nouns. eviolite (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It appears that this creation was based on a misunderstanding on what a grocer's apostrophe actually is. ValarianB (talk) 18:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment since there is disagreement as to whether "grocer's apostrophe" is semantically correct here, can we get consensus to move this shortcut? Maybe MOS:ACROPLURAL or MOS:PLURALACRO? Ibadibam (talk) 19:33, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • No, see WP:MOVEREDIRECT. However, if you think those shortcuts would be helpful, you are welcome to create them. -- Tavix (talk) 19:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bundesstelle für Fernmeldestatistik[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 23#Bundesstelle für Fernmeldestatistik

Garbage State[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 00:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects are unused and offensive terms. I know redirects can be non-neutral, but this does not meed the criteria for non-neutral redirects as it's not commonly used in any way so delete. TartarTorte 18:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It does seem to be an established slang term for New Jersey[1][2][3][4][5] //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 11:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.36019/9780813539225-003/html
  2. ^ https://www.nytimes.com/1992/08/29/nyregion/new-jersey-garbage-state-no-more-once-known-for-its-pollution-it-now-known-for.html
  3. ^ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298091892_Solid_waste_management_in_the_garbage_state_New_Jersey%27s_transformation_from_landfilling_to_incineration
  4. ^ http://www.westmilfordmessenger.com/opinion/is-new-jersey-still-the-garden-state-or-the-garbage-state-DDWM20100725307259807
  5. ^ https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1d98b20
Two of those references are the exact same article. All of them are more than ten years old. None of them demonstrate that it is a non-neutral "slang". Kire1975 (talk) 15:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Wikipedia is not the place to attack other places, not a valid search term. I will note that searching "Garbage State" on Google actually lists Garbage Patch State as the top search result, so NJ is not clearly the main target for this redirect. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment a sourced mention could be added at list of U.S. state and territory nicknames. On the other hand, it has also been used as a pejorative for Malaysia's Penang state (mentioned e.g. at history of Penang), and I'm not sure it would be worth a disambiguation. On the third hand, a nickname which has been discussed in reliable sources is certainly a valid search term, and writing about such a nickname in a neutral fashion in Wikipedia is not an "attack". 61.239.39.90 (talk) 14:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)][reply]
    Reply: Reliable sources you say? Kire1975 (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: According to nickname, pejorative terms like this are used by school bullies. Wikipedia is not a bully. Kire1975 (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Biscuit Belly[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restored article without prejudice to AfD. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No incoming links; very few page-views (~1 monthly lifetime); arguably violates R3 WP:RNEUTRAL. It was an unsourced article that was WP:BLARed in 2009. TartarTorte 17:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Restore article and send to AfD. In spite of the blank and redirect edit summary, if it has no sources (and no mention elsewhere on WP, especially at the page considered for targeting the redirect), it should go to AfD or have been PRODed. WP:BLAR is not a good alternative to deletion when it results in a redirect without mention. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Restore and send to AfD per Mdewman6. R3 requires redirects to be recently created, and speedy deletion requires all revisions of the article to meet one or more criteria. As a former article created over a decade ago this is about as far away from meeting R3 as it's possible for a redirect to be. Thryduulf (talk) 23:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I had a total brain fart when writing the RfD and used R3 to refer to rule three for why to delete a redirect and not WP:R3 which is what R3 always refers to. Fixed now. Sorry about that, I agree very much not eligible for that. TartarTorte 14:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yugoslavia-redirects[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 24#Yugoslavia-redirects

Template:Y combinator[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7. Liz Read! Talk! 19:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page author here. Accidentally made with wrong capitalisation //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 14:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy Delete per WP:G7. I just tagged the page with that with an explanation from this RfD as well. TartarTorte 18:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:ELONMUSK[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is a shortcut to Twitter as a perennial source but i found that this redirect seems to be implausible. Vitaium (talk) 13:15, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • As the creator, I would keep the redirect because Elon tweets have been discussed multiple times, to the point that it can have its own entry at the perennial source. It is also convenient and cheap to have it here, as no harm would be done really. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Using a person's name as a kind of shorthand to point to a passage regarding wrongdoing seems to be not in the spirit of good WP:BLP practice. Surely we as editors can be better than this. ValarianB (talk) 15:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – in addition to User:ValarianB's point, I see no reason why this redirect is more appropriate for Elon Musk than for the many other notable people who have Twitter accounts. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 16:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Elon Musk does an order of magnitude more announcing potentially notable things for the first time on Twitter than almost every other notable person on Twitter, especially in the business sphere, so there is a lot more justification for attaching his name to this target than almost any other person's name. That doesn't mean it's necessarily a good redirect, but it does mean that if the consensus is to delete this then there is absolutely no justification for anybody else's name to be used as a shortcut here. Thryduulf (talk) 23:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per above comments ― Levi_OPTalk 21:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Happy Editing--IAmChaos 21:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above reasons. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 07:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete because despite Musk being also known for his tweets, he is also known for many other things. Several WikiProjects could compete for this redirect, not that those would be appropriate either. Pikavoom Talk 08:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unhelpful and just about the last place I expect to be taken if given that link. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Juhn[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly per WP:RDELETE reason #10, Juhn is an artist with 13 certifications and many chartings, so the redirect can plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. Muhandes (talk) 10:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Steve Henifin[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 23#Steve Henifin

Celsius 232.78[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is not helpful to anyone. Quick Quokka [talk] 08:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, seems more for fun than anything else. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, it is just a joke. Friendly ping for @Andrewbdfe: who created this atricle. Andrewbdfe, you are creating very many redirects, not all of them make sense. Over 15% of your edits are crating a redirect (you have made about 500 edits so far and 89 of them were creating a new redirect) -- that is a lot even in proportional terms. Anton.bersh (talk) 10:04, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, mildly funny but not a useful redirect. Bonoahx (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above comments. ‍ ‍ elias. 🧣 ‍ ‍ 💬reach out to me
    📝see my work     12:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete implausible search term. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Implausible redirect. R3 may be applied to this redirect. Vitaium (talk) 15:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this redirect, while yes, that's approximately 451°F in Celsius, I don't really know if it'd be helpful "[f]or non-[A]mericans [to convert the title of a work from] Celsius to Fahrenheit" to search it up, for example the 1966 British film adaptation retains the titular temperature even if it's outside the U.S. The same might need to happen with Celsuis 233 and 233°C as well, which I'll be adding here. Regards, SONIC678 19:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as out of scope R3 Happy Editing--IAmChaos 06:08, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Does not seem like a useful redirect as it's an implausible search term. — Mhawk10 (talk) 23:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as WP:OR. I haven't checked the articles in all 48 languages, but all those I have checked use or transliterate Bradbury's original title. Narky Blert (talk) 09:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    ​ I don't think it's OR, more like WP:ONUS. Quick Quokka [talk] 22:43, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Narky Blert: I DID check all of them, except for the ones who use non-arabic numerals, and all of them are Fahrenheit, not celsius. Quick Quokka [talk] 09:21, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:ONEDAY works too. Narky Blert (talk) 10:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Square Deal Association[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 23#Square Deal Association

Tatar literature[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, since the former should refer to the literature composed by Volga Tatars rather than that composed by Crimean ones. RekishiEJ (talk) 06:58, 16 February 2022 (UTC) Added a period 08:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Straban[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 23#Straban

Corris railway station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Corris Railway#Stations and halts. Jay (talk) 03:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Section was Special:Diff/1064295911 removed from the target article under WP:NOTGUIDE #2 Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:46, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

M16 BB gun[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 03:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "M16" at target, nor is there any mention of "BB" at M16 rifle. While there are probably BB guns stylized as assault rifles, the lack of mention makes this redirect confusing and unhelpful, so it should be deleted. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alaskan Thunderfuck[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 23#Alaskan Thunderfuck

Sulur Aero[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mention of "Sulur Aero" at the target, and no indication of what it might refer to. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I imagine that it's referring to the Sulur Air Force Station which looking on Google maps is right next to Kangayampalayam. But it seems an odd way to search for it (maybe it's common in India to abbreviate Aerodrome to Aero?), I'm indifferent between deleting or re-targeting to Sulur Air Force Station. A7V2 (talk) 07:27, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Worth retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, search results (1 2) indicate an aero defence park different from the air force station. Jay (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Esplanaden[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 22#Esplanaden

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_16&oldid=1074777396"