Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 31

< October 30

November 1 >

October 31

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 31, 2021.

Mobile personal computer

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 8#Mobile personal computer

Past and Future Airlines serving YVR

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

• Past and Future Airlines serving YVR → Vancouver International Airport  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused redirect. The page does not shows the past and future airlines serving YVR. Kaseng55 (talk) 19:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete: This redirect's topic is not described in the target article. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 18:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Former and proposed airlines serving YVR

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

• Former and proposed airlines serving YVR → Vancouver International Airport  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused redirect Kaseng55 (talk) 19:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete: The target article does not describe this redirect's topic. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 18:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Argentina–Portugal football rivalry

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

• Argentina–Portugal football rivalry → Argentina–Portugal relations  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Argentina-Portugal football rivalry → Argentina–Portugal relations  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of football at the target, delete unless duly sourced information can be added. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

• Comment: I also found the hyphenated counterpart, which I'm adding here. Regards, SONIC678 19:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. If notable merits a separate article. GiantSnowman 12:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cruise entertainment

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

• Cruise entertainment → Cabaret  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, seems like a potentially much broader term than the target. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:06, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete, broad concept, could be anything Coastside (talk) 18:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC) [signed later]
• Cruise ship#Other on-board facilities seems the least bad target but deletion works too. It could mean almost anything, including Top Gun. Certes (talk) 19:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• Delete: This redirect is broad enough to be confusing, regardless of its target. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 18:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
• delete as vague --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Split-Screen Level

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

• Split-Screen Level → Pac-Man  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Points to a non-existent section. This bug is mentioned but neither described nor named in the target article (last sentence of Gameplay section). Delete. (NB an article was deleted in 2007, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Split-Screen Level, and this redirect was created two months later.) Narky Blert (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete: This redirect's title makes its purpose unclear. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 18:37, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I was considering retarggeting it to Split screen (video games) as the closest article that we got but such levels are also not discussed there. --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jeremiah J. Jackson

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• Jeremiah J. Jackson → List of people scheduled to be executed in the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No one called Jeremiah J. Jackson exists in this article anymore so this redirect should be deleted. This redirect had already previously been questioned here two years earlier but nothing came of it: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 25 Inexpiable (talk) 15:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

• Tentative delete, I couldn't find anything else on Wikipedia about this guy either. I don't know if he's notable enough to be mentioned... Regards, SONIC678 03:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
• Retarget (I think?). It seems like he exists and was sentenced to death in Cleveland, Ohio that was appealed and upheld upon appeal. He's also actually covered in an article that is specifically about the 26 people scheduled to die and in another thing between an article and a listicle, so I can actually find coverage of him in this context. It might be worthy to turn this into an article of its own; capital crimes in the USA generally receive WP:SIGCOV (especially as the execution date nears), though I'm unsure if this WP:DOGBITESMAN. I'd tentatively propose to create an article on the murder and apparent 17-day crime spree (could be a stub for now and expanded later) and to retarget the Jeremiah J. Jackson page to that article. Not exactly sure if this is a Kosher practice, though it seems to be the most reasonable thing I can think of in this case. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Comment Mikehawk10 Retarget to where exactly? There is nothing on Wikipedia about this person or the crime he was convicted of. If you are willing to create a page about him or the crime then so be, but until such page is created it should just be deleted. Inexpiable (talk) 20:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and Sonic. No mention about this person on Wikipedia, so it should be deleted as to not mislead readers. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete until it can be re-created as a redirect to the article on the "17-day crime spree". Jay (talk) 06:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of offenders scheduled to be executed in the United States in 2020

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 11#List of offenders scheduled to be executed in the United States in 2020

−3

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#-3

Music ini Romania

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

• Music ini Romania → Music of Romania  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unnecessary mispell. 0 visits in 30 days. Redirect should be deleted. Super Ψ Dro 13:08, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete: The equivalent article in Romanian is ro:Muzica românească, the title for which does not exist on the English Wikipedia, nonetheless, this is not a valid WP:RFOREIGN either. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 21:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• Delete: This is an improbable misspelling. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 18:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Judo at the South American Games

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#Judo at the South American Games

Mladost Stadium (Lučani)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 14#Mladost Stadium (Lučani)

New York Loop

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#New York Loop

NE9 station

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#NE9 station

NE8 station

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#NE8 station

NE7 station

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#NE7 station

NODE

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 00:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

• NODE → Node  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to NODE (wireless sensor) since this is the only topic entry in the dab that is an acronym. Coastside (talk) 06:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

• Oppose Someone looking for something in all caps does not mean they are necessarily looking for the acronym, as such keeping the redirect to the disambig page is more helpful to readers. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:55, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose per RandomCanadian, Node (album) is stylised in all caps for example. Thryduulf (talk) 21:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose per above. Also it might be a sort of redirect from miscapitalization. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
• Keep In general I agree with the nominator: if someone types in all caps, our first assumption should be that they are looking for something correctly written in all caps, not that their shift key got stuck or whatever. However in this case, the dab page also has the New Oxford Dictionary of English. 61.239.39.90 (talk) 06:35, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
• Keep, with agreement with 61.239 on the general case. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 15:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cutting head

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 13#Cutting head

Template:MCN

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 13#Template:MCN

Don't know and don't care

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 04:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

• Don't know and don't care → Apathy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Here's another questionable creation by JBIGW, and likely a reaction to past RfDs of their redirects. The "don't know" part would more likely be associated with ignorance or a general lack of awareness. The "don't care" part is probably closer to carelessness or negligence. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

• Delete as vague and possibly misleading — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coastside (talk • contribs) 06:54, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• Weak keep Tavix's semantics seems superficially correct when applied to the individual parts (although "don't care" here clearly has nothing to do with the sense of "care" implied in "carelessness", rather seems closer to the sense of the verb, i.e. "to think that something is important and to feel interested in it or upset about it:"), but in combination it is obvious that this is indeed referring to apathy ("behaviour that shows no interest or energy and shows that someone is unwilling to take action". The reason I say "weak" is because I'm not sure such descriptive redirects are helpful (we don't have, for example, Understanding another's view as a redirect to empathy, even if the meaning is unambiguous). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:COSTLY. This is one of those situations where allowing redirects like this could allow for an explosion in low-utility redirects. Just for this target alone, we could have I don't know and I don't care, I don't care about anything, Nothing matters, Nothing is important, etc. Instead, best to limit ourselves to phrases that have some prominent connection with the target term (e.g. if someone had written a book on apathy and repeatedly referred to it as "That 'Don't know and don't care' Feeling"), rather than any term that happens to be accurate. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 21:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete: per WP:BULLSHIT. The only conceivable purpose to this is either being POINTy or that the creator thinks Wikipedia is some nerdy competition where one can strive to get Game High Score. Utterly implausible search term. Ravenswing 13:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.