Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 12

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 12[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 12, 2019.

Pénitencier de Litchfield[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete author request. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:FORRED, I'm not familiar with any series named L'orange ç'est le noir nouveau signed, Rosguill talk 23:46, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was a mistake on my part. I wanted to create this page for the French version of Wikipedia. Thank you.Paul Morère (talk) 10:12, 13 December 2019 (UTC)Paul Morère[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Peridole[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 20#Peridole

Tombstone[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 December 27#Tombstone

Pokémon Photo Booth[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 00:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 21:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 14:56, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The game is listed at List of Android games, but retargeting there doesn't seem like a good idea since it has no other redirects for individual games. Assuming that the list is only meant to have notable games, it's possible this one shouldn't even be listed there, since we have no coverage, though I'd also assume that any official Pokémon game will meet GNG. --BDD (talk) 22:07, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Glitch City[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 00:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, and seems WP:NEO for games glitching. Steel1943 (talk) 21:06, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to VA-11 HALL-A, a quite good indie game that takes place in a setting known as "Glitch City". Totally unrelated, but still plausible as a search.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 04:16, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 14:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. While VA-11 HALL-A is the only article that mentions a "Glitch City" on Wikipedia, it doesn't have any significant coverage in that article and the Pokemon usage is by far and away the primary topic for the term and almost everyone searching for that will be surprised and/or confused by reaching something unrelated. We should not imply we have any content about this when we don't. Thryduulf (talk) 13:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete mostly per Thryduulf, although the game is not the only article that mentions a Glitch City—see search results. --BDD (talk) 22:04, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokémon USA Inc.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to The Pokémon Company. --BDD (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Note: Pokémon USA Inc. is a {{R with history}}. Steel1943 (talk) 20:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 14:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

In Dutch[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. We can revisit when the ambiguity becomes more than hypothetical. --BDD (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While both of these are the titles of songs, I think they are rather surprising targets. We don't have In French, In English and so on, however we do have wikt:in Dutch for example ("in trouble or disfavor"), which came up in the search results from sister projects.

In general, typing "In language" into the search engine returns the article for the language within the first few results, which might be more helpful than sending people off to list articles. The first is linked in three Disney-related articles, the second not at all. 85.238.91.41 (talk) 14:53, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

High Legh primary shool[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Topic isn't mentioned at the target, and the title is both spelled wrong and capitalised wrong. Reyk YO! 11:18, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Microbiology[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused redirect. It does not follow the standard name convention for banners. Magioladitis (talk) 09:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I would expect a template with this name to be a navbox for microbiology topics, not a redirect to a WikiProject banner template. Plantdrew (talk) 15:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unused, not useful, and with no history that needs to be preserved. For what it's worth, it looks like Template:Virus and Template:Metabolic pathway are in the same boat... Ajpolino (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, as a non-standard and unused (no significant links, virtually no pageviews) project banner redirect. An editor seeing the code for a transcluded project banner in the edit window should be able to immediately identify that it is a project banner based on its name, and not have to wonder or double-check. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:07, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Interplanetary Transport System[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 18:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interplanetary Transport System is the 2016 concept of the SpaceX Starship. I propose to retarget this to Starship development history#Interplanetary Transport System. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 04:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it looks like ITS launch vehicle got merged previously to Starship development history per Talk:ITS_launch_vehicle#Merger_proposal AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 07:44, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - the redirect was strange the whole time. The title is the name of a former rocket concept, it should go to an article about a former rocket concept. --mfb (talk) 06:49, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Now that we have an article about the abandoned launch system concept, separate from SpaceX's Mars colonisation ideas, yes it's better to redirect to the rocket. Not to SpaceX Starship though, but as suggested, to the specific article about the historical concept. — JFG talk 11:37, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_12&oldid=932691845"