Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 9[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 9, 2019.

Big (cat)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Big cat (disambiguation). — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a semi-continuation of an RfD from July 22, I think this is quite vague unfortunately. Was kept along with all other from the RfD on July 22 (since it was a problematic nomination, for easy closure) and I think this should be retargeted elsewhere, perhaps Big cat or Big cat (disambiguation)? James-the-Charizard (talk) 23:50, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with retargeting it to Big cat (disambiguation). ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:45, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Paul Rodriguez,jr.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article existed for around two weeks at this title before it was turned into a redirect. It currently has no (non-deletion related) incoming links, and the lack of spacing after the comma and lowercase "jr." makes this less plausible as a search term. Its view stats in the past 4 months (no views from April 20 to time of writing) are noticeably less than those of more correctly formatted variants (Paul Rodriguez, Jr., Paul Rodriguez Jr and Paul Rodriguez Jr.; Paul Rodriguez, Jr also has a low viewcount, but contains less typos). –Sonicwave talk 22:40, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete I just don't think this redirect should be kept. With 4 already good ones, keeping this unnecessary one is WP:COSTLY. James-the-Charizard (talk) 18:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Final Fantasy armor and accessories[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 27#Final Fantasy armor and accessories

Aristutalis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 18:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arisṭūṭālīs and Suqrāṭ are Persian. WP:FORRED. — the Man in Question (in question) 04:50, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Aristotle wrote on the Persians, though I'll leave it to others to decide if that's enough to declare affinity. Doesn't look like the same can be said for Socrates. --BDD (talk) 15:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Plus that would be Old Persian, not modern Persian. If that's affinity, then Julius Caesar having written about the Germanic tribes would be a basis for having Julius Caesar's name in every West Germanic language (German, Dutch, Low German, Frisian, etc.) as a redirect on the English Wikipedia. But thanks for looking into it. — the Man in Question (in question) 08:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaning keep. They are Arabic words, not (originally) Persian, and are potentially useful because they are terms used in the context of the Islamic reception of Greek philosophy, so this isn't a straightforward case of FORRED. "Aristutalis" is listed as an alternative name for Aristotle in the Oxford Dictionary of Islam, and has its own article in the Encyclopedia of Islam. "Suqrat" is less convincing, but our own article on Socrates mentions him being called Suqrat by Islamic philosophers, and the redirect gets a steady stream of hits. (I would wager it's less obvious from the word who "Suqrat" is than "Aristutalis".) —Nizolan (talk · c.) 22:42, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 21:28, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep both per Nizolan: alternative forms of the names used in a significant textual tradition. – Uanfala (talk) 11:05, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One firm keep and one "leaning" suggests a relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, StrikerforceTalk 20:50, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C11H13O[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C11H13O was created by mistake: formula of 2,6-Di-tert-butylphenol is C14H22O. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C11H13O. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 20:47, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C59H89ClN2O[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C59H89ClN2O was created by mistake: formula of DiI is …H97…O4 not …H89…O. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C59H89ClN2O. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 20:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Center for Brain and Cognition[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 18#Center for Brain and Cognition

C36H56O14[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C36H56O14 is chemical formula of digitalin. Originally digitalin was a stub article and was redirected soon to digitalis. It is a plant, one of its drugs is digitalin. The C36H56O14 → Digitalin → Digitalis double redirection was replaced by C36H56O14 → Digitalis by a bot. At this point C36H56O14 and its redir target became incoherent. Later it was modified to C36H56O14 → digoxin but chemical formula of digoxin is C41H64O14 not C36H56O14 so it is still incoherent.

There is no molecula (yet) in enwiki with formula C36H56O14. I propose to delete it. Gyimhu (talk) 19:09, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Macedondom[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 21#Macedondom

He Never Dies[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 20#He Never Dies

Gangnam, Seocho and Songpa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:19, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two redirects indicate Gangnam District, Seocho District and Songpa District. The names are misnomers. They should be deleted. Sawol (talk) 10:18, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Movement for Democracy – The Net[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 21#Movement for Democracy – The Net

The Net (Italy)[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 21#The Net (Italy)

Democrazia Cristian[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 18#Democrazia Cristian

Female Shapeshifter[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Too vague, there are lots of female shapeshifters in fiction. Female Changeling is similar but it appears to be the actual name used for the character, so I'm not as inclined to delete that one. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:09, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • What are you supporting? The nominator did not suggest any specific action. Geolodus (talk) 19:04, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was supporting deletion. I've edited my response for the sake of clarity. Gimubrc (talk) 19:11, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Bodyguard character map[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 20#Template:Bodyguard character map

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_August_9&oldid=912669853"