Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 6

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 6, 2017.

Csaszar

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 17:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Straight drop of the accents, but makes it a bit nonsense... usually I would keep when it is a simple legit {{R from title without diacritics}}, but to an English-speaking audience I am wondering whether it is too easy to confuse with cognates such as Czar, Caesar and the like. The article itself has no enyclopaedic content and should be deleted. Si Trew (talk) 23:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Daruessafaka

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. -- Tavix (talk) 15:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not Germanic but Turkish. Target is a DAB page. Si Trew (talk) 23:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tonacaçiguatl

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot created the second from the first) neither are now at target, nor anything similar ending in "-guatl". Perhaps it was when the R was created, but now both are just WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target. Si Trew (talk) 23:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Toev Prefecture

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. -- Tavix (talk) 14:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not Germanic but Mongolian. Si Trew (talk) 23:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kinga Goencz

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep as a form that is used in sources (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 11:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not Germanic but (old) Hungarian. "Göncz" is an old spelling that would not exist in modern Hungarian but is preserved in old family names. We can't proceed to mangle it this way. Si Trew (talk) 23:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Livlaendische Aa

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 11:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not Germanic but Latvian Si Trew (talk) 23:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep since it is in fact German, not Latvian. It's not getting any hits to speak of, but it's harmless and cheap and we've normally kept German ä->ae ones unless there's another reason to delete. Sideways713 (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Croisees

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 17:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not at target. Just dropping the French accents would usually not bother me, but the target is a glossary and is very particular with the terms and gives etymologies and pronunciation guides etc, so this is just wrong, it defeats the purpose of telling people what the terms are used in ballet, if any old term can be redirected to it. Were I to redirect "Balles entournees" or "mal aux pieds" to it, I don't think I would get far saying that it is just my own word for these things, we shouldn't make things up like this. WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target. Croisées from which this was formed is not at the target either, but that's a bit more marginal, because it is more obvious that it is not an English word, whereas this one could be English. We all know from our schoolboy french that it's the past tense feminine plural form of the adjective to agree with the noun (because legs are feminine), but not in English it ain't. The glossary explains all so there is no need to add inaccurate terms to it. Si Trew (talk) 23:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

91/2 Weeks

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Leaving rcat tagging of the redirect to editor discretion. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 11:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot). I don't think this film is about 45.5 Weeks, but I suppose it is harmless. Si Trew (talk) 23:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

(Mamacita) ?Donde Esta Santa Claus? (Where Is Santa Claus?)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 14:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) I seem to recall listing similar Eubot variations on this one, but can't remember the outcome. Si Trew (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_December_2#Mamacita.2C_.C2.BFd.C3.B3nde_est.C3.A1_Santa_Claus.3F_.28Mommy.2C_Where.27s_Santa_Claus.3F.29 and a few others on that day. Two were deleted but Mamacita ?Donde Esta Santa Claus? was kept. Si Trew (talk) 23:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kuebekhaza

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 14:50, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not Germanic but Hungarian. Si Trew (talk) 23:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nigueella

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 14:50, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) not Germanic but Spanish. WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Si Trew (talk) 23:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Buekk Mountains

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not Germanic but Hungarian. Si Trew (talk) 23:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Prozzaek

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. as evidence of use has been found. -- Tavix (talk) 14:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot). Canadian pop group, WP:FIRSTSENTENCE says " The name "Prozzäk" was inspired by the drug Prozac". But the name "Prozzaek" wasn't. The article doesn't say or imply that this is a metal umlaut, it doesn't seem tobe a heavy metal band, but it's certainly not a Germanic umlaut. Si Trew (talk) 23:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oxalá

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep as the term is used in the target (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 11:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(second is eubot created from the first). WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target. Si Trew (talk) 23:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tueshig, Selenge

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. -- Tavix (talk) 14:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not Germanic but Mongolian. Si Trew (talk) 23:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

African Philosophy (1369-6823)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 21#African Philosophy (1369-6823)

Barack obama

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy keep. Bad faith joke, this is not funny, clearly a useful redirect and it is not even April Fools' Day (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly no-one cares that they have been redirected from barack obama to Barack Obama, even if of those zero people, the proportion who want it to be the very first thing they see in the article is 100%. Delete and salt. Sienti (씨유엔티) 13:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC) Sienti (씨유엔티) 13:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've de-tagged the redirect for the moment, if consensus to delete builds up here we'll technically have to put it back I guess. Sienti (씨유엔티) 13:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you typed "barack obama" into the URL it would be an ill-formed URL, because URLs can't contain spaces. So somewhere along the line your typing of "barack obama" has been reformatted, anyway. The only question is where that happens. If it's the Google search bar, I think that replaces the space with %20% before sending, but doesn't change the caps. Wikipedia then changes the space to underscore for finding the article, so either you typed "barack_obama" or something along the chain did all that behind your back, anyway, and behind your back the WP search also converts lettercase if there isn't an exact title match. It didn't used to, but it has done now for a couple of years, so most {{R from other capitalization}}s are rather redundant nowadays. The advice at WP:REDIRECT#Purposes of redirects includes:
  • Likely alternative capitalizations (for example, Natural Selection redirects to Natural selection). This is not necessary for user searches made via Wikipedia's search engine, but may aid linking from other articles and external sites, as well as direct URL entry.
I seem to remember arguing after the case-sensitivity changes to the WP search engine that that advice was now out-of-date, but nothing happened about it. I think it is also positively encouraged somewhere deep in the bowels of MoS, which I gave up looking at years ago, since it is a rabbit hole I don't want to go down. Si Trew (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So you would say there would be little or no harm from deletion? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 21:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say there would be absolutely no harm from deletion. But consensus on these usually is to keep as harmless. Si Trew (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here's my objection to having (Redirected from Barack obama) right at the top of the article:
    No-one could conceivably be interested in that information
    But Wikipedia wouldn't put totally useless info at the top of the article if it knew what it was doing
    If I assume Wikipedia does know what it's doing, I will waste my time reading it
    The optional strategy of ignoring it completely is only available to people who realize that Wikipedia doesn't know what it is doing Siuenti (씨유엔티) 22:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here's my other objection:
    Just because I typed it that was doesn't mean it's my aesthetic preference.
    In fact, my preference is the correctly capitalized version .
    and in even more fact, I think Barack obama looks ugly and totally out of place in a quality encyclopedia which might be expected to have a manual of style of some kind. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 22:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point. I think it is only the desktop browser that does that, the mobile browser omits that "redirected from" line so you can be even more confused about why you ended up somewhere (This is why Goed does not exist). Most people familiar with Wikipedia skim that annoying bit at the top, but I agree with you, why say as kinda even before the lede that "The most important thing we know about Barack Obama is that some people call him barack obama"? There's probably a good case for relegating that R information to the bottom of the article, like the mobile version does, but that's outside the scope of what to do with this particular redirect, which is of course Delete on my part, for the reasons I have given at too much length. Si Trew (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Siuenti:, I deleted yours in a series of edit conflicts, I've added it back in from the previous version, but please check I have done it OK and not mangled your words. I don't really look at the manual of style much, because it changes like twenty times a day so WP:COMMONSENSE is better except on very technical things like how to format fractions, anything else in there is just a battle of opinions from people who rarely actually edit articles or think about getting readers to where they want to go, so it's not worth wasting time on. Redirects are the index of this encyclopaedia, even though we have categories, lists, WikiProjects, and 101 other ways of finding stuff, redirects are the most visible part of the index. They are the index, to a great extent. It does us well to care about how that looks. Si Trew (talk) 22:17, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the MOS position on whether "Barack obama" is good style changes more than every few years. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 22:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Basically it come down to whether you thing WP:ARTICLETITLE applies to redirects (that changed three times yesterday the fifth, and once today the sixth, so not "every few years"). I say it does, and I infer that you think it does, but the consensus is that it doesn't. There are obvious exceptions for things like {{R from misspelling}} and {{R from incorrect name}}, i.e. anything that is reliably sourced as "wrong", but just because something "gets hits" doesn't mean much to me, because if it didn't exist, it wouldn't get hits, so we can't make a comparison with the theoretical case of something not existing and people getting to the exact same target with the exact same term, by search, URL, or whatever, if it didn't exist (i.e. we have no control group). When WP:REDIRECT says that it "may aid linking from other articles", that is bollox advice in my opinion: the solution to that is to fix the articles, not make an R from incorrect spelling. Essentially, anything in {{R from incorrect capitalisation}} and suchlike should have no internal links, and those should just be sorting categories. It stems really from the idea that WP:Accidental linking is a good thing; that may have been the case back in the days of CamelCase and an even worse search engine, but is not true now. Si Trew (talk) 22:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:/sandbox

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo (both colon and slash). – Train2104 (t • c) 13:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

UKexit

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not at target, WP:MADEUP. WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target. Variants such as ukexit seem all to be red. Si Trew (talk) 12:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Early Transcendentals

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 17#Early Transcendentals

Kohi jiko

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 17#Kohi jiko

Oroszlamos

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 17:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) This was known in Hungarian as "Oroszlámos", as the article says, but was never known as "Oroszlamos". (Orosz = country, state, state government as a prefix). This makes no sense in Hungarian but this is the English WP so I suppose it is OK, but since the title is foreign-language and so is the redirect it was created from, then to aribtrarily anglicise it when it is not known in English as "Oroszlamos" is a bit iffy. Will mark as {{R from other language|hu}} without prejudice. Si Trew (talk) 09:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Qamduen

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not Germanic but Tibetan. Non-notable village that is just a geostub, article should probably be deleted as having no encylopaedic content. Si Trew (talk) 09:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cauge

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 17:16, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not sure. This is just an {{R from title without diacritics}}, correctly for a change (as Eubot did not carry over any other Rcats on the R it was making an R from, leading to nonsense), but I wonder if "Gauge" or "Cage" are more likely attempts than trying to find a small village in France. It might be better off to delete it and let the search engine do it. Si Trew (talk) 09:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a question of whether people can spell or whether they can find "é" on their keyboard, because this is not the correct spelling in the first place. People who can spell (or copy-paste) will presumably type "Caugé", but considering that this village really isn't notable by WP standards it seems to me more likely that people miss the keys or have read something wrongly (if they are not native English speakers" and see something that looks like "Cauge" but actually is "Gauge". I have absolutely no evidence of this, of course.
Really it's a question of WP:UNDUE. Going through all of these Eubot redirects to places, I've been forming the my opinion that having all these geostubs that tell you nothing about the place is not very helpful anyway, yet we tend to get half a dozen redirects to a place with various misspelling, to somewhere that is not notable in the first place; the presence of those redirects could make it seem notable beause it's not a WP:ORPHAN and so on. All the information in the target is scraped from geographical databases by bots, except for the addition of population which was done by a human editor: no actual enclopaeidic content has been added. We have of course hundreds of thousands of these useless geostubs but I don't think that Wikipedia is supposed to be some atlas, but when we have an article about the place it should say something about the place beyond its vital statistics, WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Si Trew (talk) 20:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Links to this article are almost exclusively through the navbox from other places that are also not notable and follow the same pattern. This mass import happened for French communes, happened for Hungarian villages, and no doubt for small places in other countries too but those and British ones are those that I know about. They're not encylopaedic at all. I presume the intent was that once the scaffolding was in place, people would feel it easier to add content, but in fact no content has been added. Si Trew (talk) 21:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Toguei, Boyaca

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:13, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) not germanic but (Colombian) Spanish. WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Si Trew (talk) 08:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Masat Hoeyuek

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 17:13, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Not Germanic but Turkish. Si Trew (talk) 08:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oulujaervi

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep as evidence of use has been provided. -- Tavix (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) not germanic, but Finnish. Lede gives Swedish (Germanic) name, as "Ule träsk", so I am not sure then to invent a germanic name when that is not the germanic name is very helpful. Si Trew (talk) 08:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mons Ruemker

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 17:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) probably this is OK but is technically a mixed-language redirect because "Mons" is Latin, not English, so if something is named like this it is named on purpose (like plant names that User:Plantdrew can usually answer) and the whole point is to name it unambiguously, not to then screw it up by adding variations. This is a fairly simple one, but I think on the cusp, Eubot just renamed a mountain on the moon. Si Trew (talk) 08:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Moero! Nekketsu Rhythm Damashii Osu! Tatakae! Oendan 2

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(eubot) Delete. I cannot even see what the difference is between this redirect and its target, but patently it is not a {{R from title without diacritics}} nor a {{R from other language}} (Japanese) nor anything really except harmful clutter. Si Trew (talk) 08:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, "Oenden 2" has somehow been kinda un-formed from "Ouenden 2", by way of "Moero! Nekketsu Rhythm Damashii Osu! Tatakae! Ōendan 2 ", I guess (that was created by User:Masem). I think this makes it bollox without the stress mark, doesn't it? Why not, otherwise, just knock off one of the i's in "Damashii"? The syllabary is important, I think, so one can't go buggering about with it like this: but I have forgotten most of what I learned in Japanese class. Si Trew (talk) 08:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can see it being a {{R from misspelling}} but I am not sure anyone is going to type that whole lot out, exclamation marks and all, and the only mistake they make is turning a stress mark into an "oe". Of course, typing etc is not the only way people seach for things, but when they do search this way or copy-paste or whatever, this is just cluttering their search. Si Trew (talk) 09:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Personally, I would not even bother to type all that out and would rather type just "Ouendan 2". Again, I doubt anyone would bother to type out the whole thing, minus a letter. Blorper234 (talk) 03:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ponca City, OK mSA

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep by default as the nominator is OK with a keep. -- Tavix (talk) 17:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Eubot) This is probably OK but I can never remember the exact consensus on these "mSA" or "MSA" suffixes. Is this OK? Back-formed from the R at Ponca City, OK μSA. Probably a keep. Si Trew (talk) 08:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gustav Adolfi Guemnaasium

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. -- Tavix (talk) 14:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(BOTH eubot) Not Germanic but Estonian. Plenty-o-redirects without dias to this one, without needing to make up this WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. the double "aa" in "Gumnaasium" is fine, that's in the Estonian (without diacritics anyway), but then taking the "u" to "ue" is not fine. Both as usual marked as {{R from title without diacritics}} when the target doesn't have any diacritics in it anyway; back-formed from Rs from titles with diacritics. Duh. Si Trew (talk) 08:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Juerg M Stauffer

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 14:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Eubot) clutter, really. This has been back-formed from the redirect at Jürg M Stauffer, which is or should be a {{R from other punctuation}} (no dot after the middle initial). That's fine, but we don't have to pile on every conceivable variant, or we end up with the usual Windischgraetz of having eighteen redirects to one person, none of which actually helps a search, but can only hinder it. He has four of the more obvious redirects for "Jurg" etc, this one is just over-egging the pudding. Si Trew (talk) 08:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jaegerhorn af Spurila

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 14:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Eubot). Something of a mixed-language redirect; Eubot has transliterated the "ä" to "ae" but not the "af" to "of". Not kinda a very strong argument that, because "af Spurila" is really the surname (like the "O" or "Mac" and so on in surnames), but if you want to get the surname right, get the forename right, too: if you want to translate one half of it, translate the other half, Don't mess with Mr. In-Between. Weak delete. Si Trew (talk) 07:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Twinkle API went down for a bit. I think this is fine, to add: Swedish not German proper, and although consensus is to keep Swedish ones, I think this enough to suggest a delete, weakly. Si Trew (talk) 08:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: No, no, no, Si Trew. Jägerhorn is a surname, not a forename. There is no forename in this article title. And I really don't understand what relevance you think the Celtic "O" or "Mac" have in this case, as they have no obvious relationship or similarity to any part of this name. --Hegvald (talk) 01:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Didn't we normally keep such redirects for Swedish names? As for the nom's rationale that the redirect mixes up its codes: the two parameters there are kind of orthogonal and its perfectly normal for the English rendering of a proper name to transliterate non-ASCII characters without at the same time translating the constituent words. – Uanfala (talk) 16:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Béla crater

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 14:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(The second is a Eubot creation from the first). WP:RFD#D2 confusing, perhaps refine to section Mons Hadley#Nearby craters, but there is nothing really encyclopaeidic there, beyond its coordinates. The derivation there in the table is "Hungarian masculine name" (correctly) but "Bela" without the accent is not a common Hungarian masculine name. (Accents are significant in Hungarian.) That's no problem in itself, but combined I think this becomes a bit odd. It would be encyclopaedic if we said that it was named after e.g. Béla Bartok, but we don't, and WP:NOTDIRECTORY, Wikipedia is not just a place to list stuff without encyclopaedic content, not even coordinates of things on the moon. Search results I get all lead back to the Wikipedia article, so we need at least RS that NASA (presumably) did in fact name a crater on the moon "Béla". Si Trew (talk) 07:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Propagation of errors resulting from algebraic manipulations

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 16#Propagation of errors resulting from algebraic manipulations

Internet Music Video Database

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Music And Musical Instruments

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:XY Implausible search term. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Us dem

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per the creator's request below. Hut 8.5 20:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ASTONISH. Makes me think of "us" and "them". Also implausible for the target. Just too many changes. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not a common abbreviation, and incorrect capitalization (but that alone is not a reason I would usually vote to delete a redirect]]. I'll note that US Rep and Us rep do not exist, but AFAIA, that is a more common abbreviation for "US Representative]] rather than "Republican". - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Search Wikipedia

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Help:Searching. -- Tavix (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this is needed since it is a cross namespace soft redirect to a special page, and the main way people would get to it is by searching for it in the search box, making it a duplicate. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changing my !vote - just realized that "Search Wikipedia" verbatim is the prefill text in the search box. In the event of a browser or script malfunction, that text could end up becoming the search term. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, since users may not understand that this is a search box. I could picture little kids entering "Search Wikipedia" into the search box just to see what happens. UpsandDowns1234 00:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by UpsandDowns1234 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It's a WP:XNR and it was created only 25 minutes before it was nominated here. Might as well get rid of these before we start seeing arguments for redirects such as View history being created. The nominated redirect is not an article or is related to any specific article, and thus should be deleted. I mean, editors would literally have to type "Search Wikipedia" into the bar that already says "Search Wikipedia" to even trigger this redirect. Or, at Special:Search, searching for Search Wikipedia would return the reader to where they already are, possibly causing confusion. For these reasons, I really don't see this redirect as helpful at all. Steel1943 (talk) 03:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Also, I oppose "Retarget to Help:Searching" (but I oppose "keep" more) since that target is also not an article. In fact, one would think that Wikipedia's search function itself is notable in one way or another. I skimmed over the article Wikipedia a bit, and I couldn't find an appropriate section to retarget this redirect. In fact, at this point, I'm essentially convinced that this redirect should be deleted per WP:REDLINK unless an appropriate target in the article namespace (even if it's a section of another article) is found. Steel1943 (talk) 16:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a response to my comment? I'm unclear on this because I've already presented my stance on why I disagree about how that is helpful. Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete it's not working, obviously a failed G2 test. Cabayi (talk) 07:12, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Help:Searching which is the target most likely to be helpful to the people using this redirect - very new users who want to know how to search (better) and haven't yet learned about namespaces. Thryduulf (talk) 08:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but retarget, as suggested by Thryduulf. While the idea behind it is quite a good one, its present form it is not going to be useful to any normal user of the encyclopaedia (not an editor), as it just displays a "soft redirect" message, rather than actually taking the user to the search box, and most people won't know what that means. I thought a hard redirect would work, but it doesn't. However, Thryduulf's suggestion is likely to be helpful to helpful to such users. If this suggestion is not accepted then it has to be delete, since in its present form it is not helpful. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose keeping this as a {{soft redirect}}. There are only four transclusions of Template:Soft redirect in the mainspace, all of which are currently listed at RfD, none of which are likely to be retained. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tsang (surname) (disambiguation)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted. by admin User:Kurykh (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary and potentially confusing double disambiguation, given that surname pages are usually SIAs, not disambiguations. -- Tavix (talk) 01:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And what would be the benefit for doing this? That doesn't mitigate the confusion whatsoever. -- Tavix (talk) 02:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How is this still confusing?--Mr. Guye (talk) 03:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You're wanting to retarget a redirect that ends in "(disambiguation)" to a page that's not a disambiguation. -- Tavix (talk) 03:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When I created the page I set it to Tsang (surname), but a bot edited. I am not sure how we could implement your solution without dealing with the bot. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks User:Emir of Wikipedia, taking to CSD under WP:G7 referring back to here. If the bot causes nonsense, we should disable the bot until it is fixed. Si Trew (talk) 12:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Si Trew, I removed the {{Db-g7}} tag since Mr. Guye expressed an opinion in this discussion other than deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 14:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this is Tsang (surname) not Tang (surname), but thanks for taking WP:CSD#D1. Just to add salt to the fire, Tang (Chinese surname) -> Tang (surname), which is redundant but harmless, I suppose, yet implies that we also have Tang (German surname) or whatever; then we would need Tang (surname) (disambiguation). Si Trew (talk) 21:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We would never need double disambiguation. Such case would be an WP:INCOMPDAB. -- Tavix (talk) 22:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Si Trew (talk) 22:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Texas Gov.

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. There's consensus that the abbreviation is commonly used and warrants having a redirect. The nominator's rationale that it is ambiguous doesn't appear to have received support. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 11:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous abbreviation, could also point to Government of Texas. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr. Guye: That's an unnecessary comment as WhisperToMe has already been notified of this discussion, see User talk:WhisperToMe#Texas Gov. listed at Redirects for discussion. -- Tavix (talk) 03:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I created them since many newspapers abbreviate governor as "Gov." Example: http://www.dallasnews.com/news/texas-politics/2017/01/20/decrying-sanctuary-cities-texas-gov-gregabbott-threatens-cut-millions-travis-county - If it's better to make them disambiguation pages, that's fine. It may be good to consult style guides to see if there are particular times to use "Gov."
WhisperToMe (talk) 06:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But honorifics come before a person's name, in English. That would be "Gov. Texas" not "Texas Gov.", just as all the letters come after my name and not before it. I think we need more than that the abbreviation is used, but that generally in print the whole phrase is used, and not, e.g. the red "Gov. Texas". It's usually a bit of WP:PEACOCK to use these honorifcs anyway, Albert Einstein is thus and not all the jots and tittles he no doubt had before and after his name. Si Trew (talk) 12:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
From the source quoted: "For example, Dr., Gov., Lt. Gov., Rep., the Rev. and Sen. are required before a person’s full name". Before their full name. That does not apply here to Texas, it is neither before, nor Texas' full name (which is irrelevant), nor the Governor of Texas' full name. Irrelevant to here. These honorifics apply to people not their roles, perhaps with the exception of Mr. President. Si Trew (talk) 12:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Newspapers have used the format "Texas Gov." for "Texas Governor" and "Oklahoma Gov." for "Oklahoma Governor" - Examples:
While within most formal literature things are fully spelled out, abbreviations are used in newspaper headlines as they take up less space. Journalism has its own set of conventions and Wikipedians need to familiarize themselves with them.
I made these headlines because newspapers can, and do, write the state job titles in that format, and readers who type in the name into the URL space need to be directed to the right place.
WhisperToMe (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's true, of course, I was just saying that the given link to the given style guide is irrelevant because it doesn't cover these cases, it covers the cases where the full name of the representative is put in print, and that doesn't apply here.
I saw, when I checked it, that the style guide has its own conventions such as putting section headings all in lowercase, but I doubt we would follow that advice here and tear up our own dear WP:MOS. The quoted style guide is just irrelevant for our purposes.
It's not really a case of Headline language but, yes, one of brevity when people are familiar on a subject. I still feel that really if you see "Texas Gov. George W. Bush" you are more likely to search for George W. Bush than you are for Texas Gov., or if you are looking for information about "Mary Fallin" then you don't search for "Oklahoma Gov." or OK Gov or whatnot. I you want to know about Theresa May you don't type in MP or Rt. Hon. even though they are part of her formal title (as is Lord, technically). In British newspapers the trend generally seems not to list titles anyway, although the BBC usually do on political programmes and in the straplines at the bottom of the screen on news interviews. Si Trew (talk) 20:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hehehe, yeah. And why did people write "Fuck Dubya" on toilet walls? Because they couldn't be bothered to write "Fuck the Governer of the Government of the State of Texas". Si Trew (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brown (Batman)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 16#Brown (Batman)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_April_6&oldid=1088107980"