Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 17[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 17, 2016.

Batman in Barcelona: Dragon's Knight[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, besides the complete WP:SURPRISE, apparently, the redirect is an actual Batman comic series, so WP:REDLINK. Steel1943 (talk) 22:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

AssCreed[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#AssCreed

The real Bond[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Inspirations for James Bond. JohnCD (talk) 21:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. Without a reference citing this name being a known nickname for the subject, this redirect could serve as an ambiguous WP:SURPRISE because of James Bond and other topics. Steel1943 (talk) 21:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kid icarus wii[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#Kid icarus wii

Yanagisawa Asami[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Already deleted per G5 — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 20:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No source, created by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. Lanwi1 (talk) 20:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Asami Yanagisawa[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Already deleted per G5 — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 20:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No source, created by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. Lanwi1 (talk) 20:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

柳沢麻美[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Already deleted per G5 — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 20:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No source, created by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero. Lanwi1 (talk) 20:03, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Wikipedia:wikipedia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems redundant. Creation was not explained — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 19:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Wikipedia:wikipedia is separately at MfD. — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 20:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as it's useless. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as an implausible search term. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 03:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete:Delete:Delete AngusWOOF (barksniff) 03:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This seems like the creator's attempt at humor. Serves no purpose though and likely won't ever be a search term. ERK talk 08:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sitka city and, Alaska[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted as G7.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFD#DELETE #8. The omission of an entire word (Borough) makes this a very unlikely search term. BDD (talk) 19:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. That, and because Alaska Sitka city and doesn't exist. Steel1943 (talk) 19:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It was a mistake when I created it, but back then we didn't delete redirects so it was allowed to live. It serves no purpose otherwise. It should be speedily deleted. -- RM 19:32, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete implausible synonym --Lenticel (talk) 00:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Competitive Counter-Strike[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of eSports games#Counter-Strike series. -- Tavix (talk) 02:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is not mentioned in the target article, making the use of the adjective "competitive" unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 19:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Marie-Andre Chenier[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

His full name was "André Marie Chénier." I can't imagine why someone would switch his names and then hyphenate them. -- Tavix (talk) 18:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sigehumi Hino[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 30#Sigehumi Hino

Iron loss[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#Iron loss

Super-Grammaticam[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix (talk) 00:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TRIVIA, and doesn't appear in the article. It was indeed a title applied to the subject, but it is based on one source here, is based on one event, and appears to be nothing but Carlyle being facetious. MSJapan (talk) 17:26, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It does appear in the article, just in the footnotes and without the dash. I've now included it in the body. Verifiable, lasting apocryphal stories of academic interest are generally fine. WP:TRIVIA does not apply in this case as this does not deal with a "trivia" section in anyway, but sourced, verifiable information in the body of the article. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big state[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 30#Big state

Jimmyjohns[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Jimmy John's as more plausible target. Deryck C. 12:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would this Neelix redirect be more suitable to redirect to Jimmy John's? A carboy is a typed a demijohn, and a demijohn is known as a jimmyjohn in the U.S. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that one's fine because of the lack of "s", though I did argue above that even with the "s" it should redirect to carboy, so others may disagree. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:52, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 14:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support hatnote it's an old term which the Books searches uses. All the "newer" searches to web articles point to Jimmy John's. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep & hatnote. Historical usage trumps name of restaurant chain, considering that is most likely how the chain received its name. Steel1943 (talk) 19:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Now neutral since it is not mentioned in the target article, most search restore return the restaurant chain and ... Wikt:jimmyjohn and Wikt:jimmyjohns do not exist, so thus there is no reference for this even in Wiktionary. Steel1943 (talk) 14:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've added it to the target article with a source. Not going to learn how to Wiktionary now though. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Added hatnote. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Jimmy John's. The restaurant appears to actually be named after the founder/owner Jimmy John Liautaud.[2] PaleAqua (talk) 04:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Switched from comment to retarget per Tavix. PaleAqua (talk) 03:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Jimmy John's. "Jimmyjohn" isn't mentioned at carboy and my search overwhelmingly gave me the sandwich chain. -- Tavix (talk) 23:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's probably because its website is at jimmyjohns.com. Peter James (talk) 12:50, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Which is even more of a reason to retarget it. It's a plausible search: someone checks out the website and wants to know more about the company. -- Tavix (talk) 14:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would support a retarget if carboy was hatnoted from the company article. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Counter-Srike[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely typo. Izno (talk) 14:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above. Prof. Mc (talk) 17:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I was actually thinking about nominating this myself a few hours ago when I noticed its existence. Steel1943 (talk) 17:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete implausible typo that would just mess up searches for the real one. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 23:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Indian America[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 11:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this redirect maybe should be retargeted, but I don't know where. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Indian Americans which refers to Americans from India but has a hatnote to Native Americans in the United States up top. The term has been used to refer to either of the two main people groups. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not a big fan of this. "[Nationality] America" isn't a common construction in the first place. You'd see it most often in discussion of historical claims of other countries on American (not just US) land—e.g., British America, French America, Russian America. And in that sense, there has never been an Indian America. But territorial considerations are a tremendously important topic in the context of indigenous peoples. That's obviously what the redirect is trying to express now, and I think we can fix that without changing its meaning altogether. --BDD (talk) 00:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Changed my vote. There are a handful of books that use "Indian America" as their title, and this refers to the Native Americans group. Redirects here still applies. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 15:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Miss Emma[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete some: "White Nurse", "Glad stuff", and "White merchandise". Some others have already been deleted or disambiguated during the course of the RfD. Keep the rest as attested slang words for morphine. Deryck C. 11:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These Neelix redirect fails WP:WINAD because it is slang. Nominated them for speedy delete, but some were declined. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Maybe you'd better put all the others here too. I don't see how a redirect can constitute a dictionary entry; they're meant to aid navigation. That's just what these redirects do. Adam9007 (talk) 01:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment WP:WINAD also applies to slang. All of these are slang for morphine. There's also Morfa (drug) and Morphy (drug) but wasn't sure to nominate them. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • I wouldn't call a redirect a guide though. If the term refers to something (which these do) I wouldn't be surprised to see a redirect. Adam9007 (talk) 01:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The redirects guideline states that "If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name, it is unlikely to be useful." Thus, delete all. ViperSnake151  Talk  03:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Many of these are listed as informal names for morphine in reliable sources such as this one [3] ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 08:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all not in target article Morphine#Slang terms. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 04:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Most of them are now, with sourcing from here: [4]. White Nurse and White Merchandise are not there, but I saw some reliable sources using the latter when I declined the speedy. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 08:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This still fails WP:WINAD. An alias is not needed for every street name for a drug, which the book attempts to collect. Only the ones that are used prominently in news sources and most likely to be linked from other articles should be referenced. Just as with track listings and singles names. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep most as sourced, though I disambiguated "happy powder" and "joy powder" since the sources I found that led me to decline indicated that they could refer to several drugs. Those two should stay that way, and some of the other redirects may also need to be turned into DAB pages. "God's medicine" was redirected to Kenneth E. Hagin because he wrote a book of that name. If there's sources to link it to morphine or some other drug, that'll be worth a hatnote. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 08:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I've struck out the ones that have been deleted or no longer point to Morphine.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 12:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cat Claw[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 30#Cat Claw

The Greatest Ever[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant names. NasssaNser talk|cont 10:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete POV redirect, with references in the infobox mentioning this nickname consisting of one failed ref and one dead link. OnionRing (talk) 11:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Totally WP:POV with, as shown above, failed reference verification. Steel1943 (talk) 17:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • And, since it looks like it has been created before, it may be wise to salt this title after deletion, but only two creations may be a little too early for tha course of action to be proven. So, I guess WP:G4 may work until creation protection is more obviously needed. Steel1943 (talk) 19:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ugh, Delete.. again. It already got zapped the last time, and it's clearly meant only for the purpose of peacocking the Ali Raymi article. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Astoria (disambiguations)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted, G5. -- Tavix (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary redirect, as Wikipedia never uses (disambiguations) at the end of an disambiguation. NasssaNser talk|cont 09:35, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this was created by what is clearly a sock of block user. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

For the sake of honor[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#For the sake of honor

New flower[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of name, sure. Alternative name for the city, no. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:01, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Neelix nonsense. We don't redirect origin meanings of non-English proper names. Softlavender (talk) 04:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. Actually, we do do this since this is the English Wikipedia. English translations of foreign proper names are likely and plausible search terms because ... English. Steel1943 (talk) 17:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • ...And downgrade me to "weak": I must have overlooked the "Alternative name for the city, no." part. Steel1943 (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Anyone not familiar with the etymology of the city will just be confused, anyone who is familiar won't need a redirect page, and it's just plain silly regardless. JohannSnow (talk) 22:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete Obviously "new flower" could be anything, a city, a flower..... Anyone looking for a city is going to come from something saying "Addis Ababa means 'new flower'". Mangoe (talk) 00:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:XY Unless that city name is commonly known in English as New Flower. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Us Airways Company Store[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the article doesn't discuss the US Airways Company Store, creating confusion in case anyone decides to search for it. From what I can find, the store didn't seem very noteworthy, so I don't know why it would be mentioned. The airline, and thus the store, is now defunct. I'm also adding the website for the same reasons; FWIW, the website is down for everyone. -- Tavix (talk) 03:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2018 AFC Champions League[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL until a proper, sourced article can be created. No specific information about this event exists at the target article. -- Tavix (talk) 03:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2017 State of Origin series[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:14, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL until a proper, sourced article can be created. -- Tavix (talk) 03:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the harm in the redirect, as it will discourage recreation of the page by anon's but not opposed to deletion. Mattlore (talk) 07:01, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:REDLINK. If an article can be made with proper sourcing, it should be encouraged. No information about the 2017 iteration of this event at the target page. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2017 Philippines national basketball team results[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is nonsense. You can't have results for something that hasn't happened yet. -- Tavix (talk) 03:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sundlaug[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:13, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some WP:RFOREIGN terms created by Tryggvia. They should all be Icelandic and none of the targets have any affinity with that language. -- Tavix (talk) 03:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Already linked to Icelandic Wikipedia. Does not need an entry in the English one. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tr8n[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure this is nonsense. -- Tavix (talk) 01:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article Numeronym lists tr8n as an abbreviation for translation. There also appears to be a piece of translation software with this name [5]. Uanfala (talk) 09:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, my search was dominated by the software, which is where I thought this originated from. -- Tavix (talk) 16:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete My searching indicates the most common use for this is for the software program. For someone trying to learn about it, this redirect is just in the way. I doubt the translation program is notable, but either way, this redirect needs to go. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Oiyarbepsy. It's not as prevalent as i18n and the software is probably the primary meaning. Deryck C. 16:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. What is "treightn"? Steel1943 (talk) 19:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Redirect to Geni.com. Do the latter only if will be mentioned in the article as one of their tools/programs. [6] There is also a mention of such a command in the Ruby programming. [7] AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Acts of Mar Mari[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article's would-be content doesn't really have much affiliation with target article other than being compared in scholarly studies. I would like to recreate as an indepandant article per WP:RFD#DELETE#10 reason. JudeccaXIII (talk) 01:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Deletion is not required for you to work on the article, you can just edit the redirect page and paste in your draft. But if you insist, delete per WP:REDLINK to promote article creation. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

E13n[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this seems like an obscure or novel way to abbreviate "externalization." -- Tavix (talk) 00:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete is this like leet speak or something? Not a glossary. A book search shows it connected to some chemicalsAngusWOOF (barksniff) 04:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.