Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 October 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 4[edit]

Atomic Betty (character)Atomic Betty[edit]

The nominated redirect was Kept. Redirects tend to discourage more than they encourage article creation. -- JLaTondre 22:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone conducting a search for Atomic Betty, the character could reasonably be expected to enter the search term "Atomic Betty", in which case they would be pointed to the main article which contains character information. BlueSquadronRaven 15:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Does no harm, and may possibly do good. Gavia immer (u|t|c) 16:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Retention invites embellishment of (character) page to originator's (cf. MascotGuy) article. --Ricksy 22:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Listed below numerous Miyazaki location redirects[edit]

The nominated redirect was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 22:48, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Aki, MiyazakiAki, Oita
Higashikunisaki District, MiyazakiHigashikunisaki District, Oita
Himeshima, MiyazakiHimeshima, Oita
Kakadi, MiyazakiKakaji, Oita
Kunimi, MiyazakiKunimi, Oita
Kunisaki, MiyazakiKunisaki, Oita
Matama, MiyazakiMatama, Oita
Musashi, MiyazakiMusashi, Oita
Nishikunisaki District, MiyazakiNishikunisaki District, Oita
Oota, MiyazakiOta, Oita
Ota, MiyazakiOta, Oita

None of the above places actually exist in Miyazaki Prefecture: they are all places in Ōita Prefecture. As far as I can tell, they were created erroneously in February 2004. At the moment, the only service they are performing is to spread misinformation on Wikipedia's downstream sites and on Google. Bobo12345 08:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all of these. They are just plain wrong. Gavia immer (u|t|c) 16:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was speedy deleted (CSD R2)Gurch 11:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AVRPORPortal:Avril Lavigne[edit]

Portal Removed at MfD Nathannoblet 07:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Listed below → In the Wake of Separation[edit]

The nominated redirect was Deleted. Combination of case & spelling make them unlikely typos. -- JLaTondre 22:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In The Wake of SeperationIn the Wake of Separation
In The Wake of SperationIn the Wake of Separation
In the Wake of SeperationIn the Wake of Separation

Only album of Thine eyes bleedThine Eyes Bleed, so on re-release this year?

Kill. Overkill. Over and out. Ricksy 05:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
*Johnny ArayaJohnny Araya[edit]
The nominated redirect was Deleted by NawlinWiki. -- JLaTondre 22:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Related, see above. Ricksy 07:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The big clock in londonBig Ben[edit]

The nominated redirect was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 22:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unlikely to be used After Midnight 0001 03:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete People that would try this are too dumb to know how to use a computer anyway.--Húsönd 23:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, better not use sarcasm as a justification. Delete per nom. :-) --Húsönd 02:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was Deleted. T.U.S.A. already deleted so rest are chain of {{db-redirnone}}. -- JLaTondre 18:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The how are you nationT.U.S.A.[edit]

No evidence that the US is called the "how are you nation". TimBentley (talk) 02:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete incomprehensible triple redirect. --Metropolitan90 07:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as somewhat insane triple redirect. — Dark Shikari talk/contribs 13:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as incomprehensible (and incorrect) redirect. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 00:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete pure vandalism. Khatru2 04:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Just silly. PJM 12:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as vandalism. It's also an unnecessary triple redirect. --Coredesat (talk) 20:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THAYNThe how are you nation[edit]

See above. TimBentley (talk) 02:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete redirect to another redirect which is not useful itself. --Metropolitan90 07:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete... wait, is this a quadruple redirect?! — Dark Shikari talk/contribs 13:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as incomprehensible (and incorrect) redirect. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 00:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete pure vandalism. Khatru2 04:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. More silliness. PJM 12:48, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as vandalism, or as a horribly useless quadruple redirect. --Coredesat (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

T.H.A.Y.N.THAYN[edit]

See above. TimBentley (talk) 02:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete redirect to another redirect which is not useful itself. I recommend warning the user who created this series of redirects. --Metropolitan90 07:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as insane quintuple redirect. — Dark Shikari talk/contribs 13:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as incomprehensible (and incorrect) redirect. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 00:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete pure vandalism. Khatru2 04:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. On a roll we are. PJM 12:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete, it's fairly clear that this quintuple redirect is vandalism. --Coredesat (talk) 20:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

I.S.F.United States[edit]

The nominated redirect was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 18:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Originally a redirect to It's so fake. See its entry below. TimBentley (talk) 02:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as incomprehensible (and incorrect) redirect. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 00:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Arthur Rubin. --Metropolitan90 04:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete pure vandalism. Khatru2 04:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not plausible. PJM 12:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as vandalism. --Coredesat (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted by Jaranda (as was its target) – Gurch 11:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AHWFAsk him what freedom is[edit]

See below. TimBentley (talk) 02:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was. Speedy delete as vandalism. Ral315 (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Average AmericanRedneck[edit]

POV, implies that the average American is a redneck. TimBentley (talk) 02:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

.

The nominated redirects were all deleted by JarandaGurch 11:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PetropowerGulf war[edit]

Same as below. Heimstern Läufer 00:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PetropoliticsIraq war[edit]

POV, suggesting Iraq war was motivated by petroleum-related politics. Heimstern Läufer 00:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ask him what freedom isUnited States[edit]

Unless I'm missing something, it's pure nonsense. May be vandalism, as this user has created other odd redirects to the same article. Heimstern Läufer 00:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

AurdiereAudiere[edit]

The nominated redirect was Deleted. Unlikely typo. -- JLaTondre 22:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As per request (forwarded) Ricksy 00:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please delete this page as the person who created it spelt it incorrectly.--Visi calc 15:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If he spelled it wrong, someone else might too, so it's a good redirect Ashibaka tock 16:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

History of ScienceHistory of science[edit]

The nominated redirect was Kept --Cyde Weys 22:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a needless and confusing redirect page, however I am not sure if it is not needed, so I have listed it here. Holdek (talk) 06:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is a harmless redirect. --Metropolitan90 07:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Some people use title case, so why not have a redirect. Heimstern Läufer 14:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Single-use only, scrap redirect. Notice wiki-search gets to article direct, even with caps lock! Ricksy 21:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Metropolitan90. 70.48.111.186 21:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Harmless redirect. Besides, some people are prone to capitalize "Science".--Húsönd 23:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Pavel Vozenilek 23:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia[edit]

The nominated redirect was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 22:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It leads from the article namespace to a Wikipedia project page. Newbies could be confused and a future article about the Spoken Wikipedia is avoided at the moment. As there are enough shortcuts and you can also find the project site with the search function, I think this redirect can be deleted. --CyRoXX 23:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as annoying cross-name space redirect. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete cross-namespace, no incoming links, no history. Khatru2 04:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; cross-namespace links are bad. Ral315 (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a self-referential cross-namespace redirect. --Coredesat (talk) 20:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.