Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 October 5

< October 4

October 6 >

October 5

Chancery Lane → Chancery Lane tube station

The nominated redirect was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 12:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Not a good redirect IMO, as Chancery Lane is quite famous in legal circles as the home of many lawyers. A lot of the incoming links are totally unrelated to the tube station. Tim! 17:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nomination. I've heard of Chancery Lane, but never of Chancery Lane tube station. I imagine that's a pretty common situation. --Rbraunwa 00:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Meh? Delete. ~ Flameviper 14:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Open+content → Open content

The nominated redirect was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 22:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Seemingly repetitive and unneeded. Does anybody really search for this? Google'ing didn't get me far, as it parsed the '+' out anyway. Thadius856 04:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Unnecessary redirect.--Húsönd 22:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as implausible search term. I find it highly unlikely that anyone would search for "Open+content". Picaroon9288 23:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I've reconsidered. Some people cut and paste from the address bar. This could be helpful in such a case. Not that I'm advocating the systematic creation of these redirects, but at least this isn't ambiguous. — TKD::Talk 07:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC) Delete. Implausible typo. — TKD::Talk 06:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Keeping it to deal with cut & paste from address bar may encourage people to do the same for other articles. Pavel Vozenilek 14:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Pwn. ~ Flameviper 14:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I don't see it as plausible. PJM 19:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.