Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 January 16

< January 15	January 17 >

January 16[edit]

File:Jab We Met Parting.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8. A screenshot of these characters is not necessary to understand that they parted ways. Its omission would not be detrimental to the understanding of the article. — ξ ^xplicit 01:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Seems unnecessary and there is nothing remarkable about the scene commented on in the text. Mangoe (talk) 13:08, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABC example.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted by File:Approximate Bayesian Computation example.svg, uploaded almost simultaneously. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABC conceptual overview.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted by File:Approximate Bayesian computation conceptual overview.svg, uploaded almost simultaneously. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A dynamic bistable hidden Markov model.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted by File:A dynamic bistable hidden Markov model.svg, uploaded almost simultaneously. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:52, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OPM logo1.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted by File:US-OfficeOfPersonnelManagement-Seal.svg, which is of higher quality. Ineligible for NowCommons deletion because it is a different file format. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:57, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete superseded by much higher quality image. Mangoe (talk) 13:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Trend of KSE-100 index.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 February 7#File:Trend of KSE-100 index.jpg. — ξ ^xplicit 01:45, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused graph of no real encyclopedic use Sreejith K (talk) 04:50, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/replace This was clearly created to go in either Karachi Stock Exchange or more particularly KSE 100 Index; I don't know why it was never added. There is no similar image in either article now. The one real issue I see is that it is rather dated: the last data point on it is over five years old. Given the article text it could be argued that the graph is misleading. I'm inclined to add it to the article in lieu of having no chart at all, but I'm open to other suggestions. Mangoe (talk) 13:17, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Karachi.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The map is incorrect. See File:Location of Karachi.png for the correct map. Sreejith K (talk) 04:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete It's not wrong per se, but it is misleading. Mangoe (talk) 13:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

struck in light of comment below. Mangoe (talk) 13:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The map is indeed correct. Karachi is in the province of Sindh, which is colored red. We do the same for U.S. cities. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Awaken Dodgers.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, page deleted at AFD soon after creation: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awaken A Cappella Hairhorn (talk) 04:57, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FV Ekawat Nava 5 destroyed by INS Tabar (F44).jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of a recent historical event, the destruction of a suspected pirate vessel off Somalia. Can be covered with textual description alone; image is not necessary for understanding content; fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete fairly generic image of small boat explosion; nothing that the text doesn't already say. Mangoe (talk) 13:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bridgit Mendler - Determinate.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#3a, see File:Determinate - digital single.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

comment Not following the logic here: if we need to convey the cover information, and if there are two utterly different covers, I don't see how the minimal information needed to convey the cover information is anything less than two images. Mangoe (talk) 15:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The difference in covers is not the object of discussion in the article. Both covers are merely used as a routine infobox thing for "identification". But if the same item can be identified alternatively by any of several different covers, then none of these covers is individually necessary to identify it. The logical outcome is not that we need both, but that we need neither. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MadirasiAudioCover.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack. Stefan2 (talk) 14:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Net Gun Pit by Brian Robb.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bombay Beach Boat Benny.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly random image without critical discussion. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 17:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WallerBenj.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, worse-quality version of File:Benjamin Waller Williamsburg Virginia.jpg (also not great, unfortunately) Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:49, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wallpaper2.JPG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value (see Swieqi United F.C.), but to the extent it's anything official we'd need WP:OTRS verification which we don't have Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WAClimates.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, doubtful that uploader created this fairly elaborate map from scratch. (no source given for base map.) said to be created using powerpoint, which is not the software you'd use to draw a map like this from scratch. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete superseded by File:WA Climates.jpg which is more plausibly the work of an editor. Mangoe (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

You disputed that I created the map of Western Australian climates from Scratch using Powerpoint. This is possible - as powerpoint allows maps to be created - I have used it for many maps I have uploaded into the web. The maps are created using the polygon tool in powerpoint with the various colours created as overlays. As a powerpoint it is then saved as a jpeg file which I have then uploaded.

I hope this explains the method I have used. I would appreciate it if this satisfies you that you withdraw the map from deletion. John D. Croft (talk) 06:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walesitaly.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete Apparently intended for Welsh Italians, never used and of doubtful utility. Mangoe (talk) 20:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No encyclopedic use. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Walking in a distance.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, this professional-looking photo is all over the internet, and i don't trust that the uploader created it himself (only photo uploaded, and i'd guess that the uploader is a teenager based on his editing/interests) Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:59, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete never used, and I would agree that the uploader's editing strongly suggests claims of authorship are spurious. In any case there's no apparent use for the image. Mangoe (talk) 20:31, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Love song mv.PNG[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically, but used as decoration —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Catdlive.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image from a non-notable band. Article that previously used was WP:PRODed and later at WP:AFD deleted: "Chris and The Dickens" -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CC7 Alabama3XS.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a sepia tone version of an image on the website http://pmsphoto.photoshelter.com/image/I0000ikXfVnJng9o Possibly uploader is the same owner, as the uploaders name is similar to the company. The website lists the copyright holder as being the photography company, but unknown if true. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CedarCreekSolvey.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image is of the claims to be authored by the uploader. On the page that it is used on it is claimed to be taken by a Larry Solvey Civil War Trust#History Under Siege: The Civil War Trust's Most Endangered Battlefields The uploader has obvious WP:COI as evidenced by his page, but being that there is a difference in the purported author, it is unknown who actually owns the copyright and can therefore release it. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CentralAveHeights.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image is of low resolution, decent quality. Cannot make out enough details to garnish any encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Codes Feb 2008.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of a seemingly non-notable band. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:37, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The measument of A.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by plaintext: $A=-\log({\frac {V_{dc}}{V_{ex}}})$ Which is made by (<math>A=-\log( \frac{V_{dc}}{V_{ex}} )</math>) -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:48, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The measument of det A.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by $\Delta A={\frac {V_{ac}}{1.1515V_{dc}\delta _{0}\sin \omega t}}$ which is created by <math>\Delta A= \frac{V_{ac}}{1.1515V_{dc}\delta_0\sin\omega t} </math> -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tiger-eyes.gif[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value, might have been a logo for a school, but looks user made from an image of a tiger (unknown source) and it uses Comic Sans (ICK!) -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 23:07, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete never used, of no real value. Mangoe (talk) 23:59, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:W6RDFs.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, presumably non-free logo (though marked as PD-USgov), doesn't seem to be a notable organization Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete The organization is mentioned in a list but the only thing approaching an article was a sandbox version back in April 2007. Certainly the USGOV copyright tag is in error. I would imagine the image is replaceable (and probably in better quality) if fair-use is justified. Mangoe (talk) 00:04, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abberefractometers2.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image says that the pictures were taken from www.atago.net but does not say whether permission was granted by atago for the pictures to be used. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 23:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete The image situation in this article is terrible, with the one thing not being shown is a picture of how the thing works. A page from a catalog which doesn't really tell us anything. Mangoe (talk) 03:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.