User talk:Stephanie J Stone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Stephanie J Stone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 06:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Lopez[edit]

Thank you for your additions to Jennifer Lopez discography. However splitting the singles into decades is not required. This type of formatting is reserved for artists who's careers have spanned many years. With a singing career of just 12 years splitting the tables serves no purpose considering that the majority of her singles fall in the middle years leaving two small tables at the beginning and end. The formatting as such unecessarily adds 8,000 kb to the article without adding anything else. Please do not make such edits again. You made an edit, i reverted and thus according to WP:BRD you should no discuss at Talk:Jennifer Lopez discography. — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 02:26, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ariana Dvornik for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ariana Dvornik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariana Dvornik until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J Milburn (talk) 20:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Lady Gaga discography has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball", which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. — Legolas (talk2me) 08:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not include the Hot 100 Brasil, Portuguese National Top 50, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 14:03, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been looking over your discography work, and I've had to do a lot of removals. Please refer to WP:GOODCHARTS when determining what charts to include, and WP:Record charts for general guidelines. Charts that are only sourced on blogspot or similar hosters are never suitable. Also, please include a source for all chart positions. I've had to assume that the charts you were adding labeled "ABPD" from 2001 and 2002 were actually from hot100brasil.com. Hot100brasil.com is not ABPD: it's an amateur chart with no known sources.—Kww(talk) 13:25, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kevin Simm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 21:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WYWH[edit]

Please, stop creating that page until it is actaully released. All the information is exactly the same Goodbye Lullaby alreary has. Being a single is not a reason for creation, and as WP:NSONGS says: "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article", and all sources come from the album article. I'm requesting you to wait until the song is released establishing its notability by itself thanks to more than 3 charts and album reviews. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

I nominated an article of yours for DYK. Joe Chill (talk) 23:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Big Time Rush discography, you may be blocked from editing. stop just copying and pasting incorrect information into this article. you are removing correct formatting, reliable sources and other info. Mister sparky (talk) 20:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing[edit]

Hi Stephanie, I have noticed that in Kelly Key (2001 album) you misrepresented some sources and falsified others. It is a violation of our verifiability policy to do so. Please cite actual, reliable sources in relation to the subject. Any information not supported by sources may be deleted. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:23, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whitney Houston discography[edit]

Hi! Can you explain why you split the discography into albums and singles discographies when the consensus is against it? I'm going to merge them back. Please discuss next time before you make any drastic changes. Thank you. Novice7 (talk) 04:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Stephanie J Stone (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
186.224.184.174 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ingrid Rodrigues". The reason given for Ingrid Rodrigues's block is: "Vandalism".


Accept reason: Bug in new software caused this. --jpgordon::==( o ) 18:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Stephanie J Stone (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
186.224.185.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ingrid Rodrigues". The reason given for Ingrid Rodrigues's block is: "Vandalism".


Accept reason: Should be cleared now. Alexandria (talk) 13:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to be in the same IP range as the unblock above it, same bug? Alexandria (talk) 11:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Mariah Carey singles discography, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 00:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Bridgit Mendler discography, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page UK Charts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Lemonade Mouth (soundtrack), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Leonard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bella Thorne, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Shake It Up: Break It Down, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What possible reason do you have for not conforming to formatting standards described in Template:Navbox Musical artist? Specifically look at the Examples and See also sections. Your way makes maintenance significantly more difficult and adds nothing that can't be achieved by following the standard layout. Also reverting an edit without an explanation in the edit summary is not helpful in the goal of collaborative editing of articles. --Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Kidz Bop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Kelly Key, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spanish, Single and Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Debby Ryan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article splits[edit]

See WP:SPLIT. If you believe the new article meets WP:N, then do the split but don't forget to leave the required attribution histories in both the source and destination articles. A note in the edit summaries of each article saying what you are doing, where the content came from and where the content is going, is the bare minimum needed to meet attribution requirements. See also WP:Copying within Wikipedia for more. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Nayer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:McClain Sisters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. - Purplewowies (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Cody Simpson discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARIA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Certifications[edit]

Please don't insert certifications into articles that contradict the official databases. Skyscraper is listed as Gold, not platinum.—Kww(talk) 23:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Demi Lovato promotional tours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sparks Fly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

False data[edit]

In this edit, you entered incorrect data for two chart positions. The position for "Skyscraper" looks to be an honest mistake: when the chart is listed as "Tip", that's not the main chart. It isn't correct to mix two different charts in one column. The other one looks more serious: the sources lists "41" as the position, and I can't see any reason that you would believe it to say "2".—Kww(talk) 02:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions[edit]

You have been an editor long enough to know the difference between a reliable source and an unreliable source. In this edit, you inserted a group of references to the "mixcharts" channel on YouTube. Worse yet, you did so with an unexplained reversion. How can you justify this reversion? What logic would lead you to believe that this channel qualifies as a reliable source?—Kww(talk) 18:25, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bridgit-mendler-summertime.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bridgit-mendler-summertime.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Good Luck Charlie into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Also split was discussed and rejected by concensus Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:59, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Good Luck Charlie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:05, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Victoria Beckham discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Singles and ARIA
Bananarama discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to True Confessions

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:46, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Desire (Geri Halliwell song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Passion
Geri Halliwell discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Passion
Rachel Stevens discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Compilation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hannah Spearritt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kevin O'Sullivan
Upper Street (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Another Level

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:48, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Disney Channel Playlist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 07:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bella Thorne has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rihanna discography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Till 06:25, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Debby Ryan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Glades (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Lil-unique1. Your recent edit to the page Kelly Rowland discography appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 20:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disney Fairies: Faith, Trust And Pixie Dust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shake It Up (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Austin & Ally into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. This is trivially easy to do, it just requires info in edit summaries, but a bit annoying to have to do it for others. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bridgit Mendler - Determinate.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bridgit Mendler - Determinate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 00:36, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hayley Kiyoko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Digital download
The Stunners (group) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Madonna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Websites to avoid[edit]

Please do not add links to charly1300.com, or any other site listed at WP:BADCHARTS#Websites to avoid, to any Wikipedia articles.—Kww(talk) 16:42, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand certifications[edit]

New Zealand certifications are certainly real, but this one hasn't got a source. Take a look at the big bright red error message in citation 42 and find a source before you put it back. There's a reason that I remove things with an edit summary of "unsourced", and you shouldn't revert without providing a source.—Kww(talk) 01:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"ZZZZZZZ" or not, you need to take these concerns seriously. The history of the article shows that you are constantly restoring material that other editors have removed without making any effort to fix it. If that continues, you will be blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 02:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again[edit]

Are you actually claiming that this book, published today, has already made it to Brazil so you could have look at it and use it as a citation?—Kww(talk) 18:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block warning[edit]

The next time you add information based on anonymous Twitter accounts to a Wikipedia article, you will be blocked from editing. You know our policies on sourcing, and you know that anonymous tweets don't cut it. Apparent fabrication of sources, as you did here doesn't make me look at your edits any more kindly.—Kww(talk) 19:50, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We'll broaden that: material sourced to fansites, completely unsourced material, or fictitious sources will also result in you being blocked. If you cannot find the material in a reliable source, then don't add it at all.—Kww(talk) 02:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not xenophobic. I don't care about Bridgit Mendler. I simply want you to stop introducing unreliably sourced material to Wikipedia.—Kww(talk) 02:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:NPA. The fact that you use bad sources doesn't make me a bigot. I block people all the time for the use of sources like the ones you are using, and they come for all over the world, primarily the US and Europe.—Kww(talk) 02:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Zendaya: Behind the Scenes[edit]

Hi, I'm Sumanah. Stephanie J Stone, thanks for creating Zendaya: Behind the Scenes!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be great if you could clarify the sentence that says "The video contains still manages to make time for her fans" and make it grammatical.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.


Category:Debby Ryan[edit]

Category:Debby Ryan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:43, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicole Appleton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Never Ever (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Shake It Up - I Love Dance.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Shake It Up - I Love Dance.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bridgit Mendler - This is My Paradise (cover single).jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bridgit Mendler - This is My Paradise (cover single).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bridgit Mendler - Forgot to Laugh.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bridgit Mendler - Forgot to Laugh.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Stevens discography[edit]

Hi. I have reverted your edits to the Rachel Stevens discography because you re-added material that wasn't referenced with reliable citations. Furthermore, the lead was previously changed to fix grammar, spelling and prose. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave me a message. Thanks – Underneath-it-All (talk) 21:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kids Choice Awards France listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kids Choice Awards France. Since you had some involvement with the Kids Choice Awards France redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Astros4477 (Talk) 21:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Italy Kids Choice Awards listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Italy Kids Choice Awards. Since you had some involvement with the Italy Kids Choice Awards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Astros4477 (Talk) 21:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images of Debby Ryan[edit]

Category:Images of Debby Ryan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 11:12, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Luke Benward, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 02:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radio Disney Music Awards, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Usher and Cheetah Girls (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Brdgit Mendler - Ready or Not (music video).png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Brdgit Mendler - Ready or Not (music video).png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Essential (Atomic Kitten album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to It's Ok!
Sinéad O'Carroll (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Girl band

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hilary Duff discography[edit]

Refrain from reverting to a revision which needs updates and corrections. Everything currently is well sourced including albums and singles peaks for the UK. Also, I have updated sources for Japan's and Canada's certifications. If you have other concerns, feel free to discuss them at Talk:Hilary Duff discography, but do not revert a well organized revision to an older one which needed work.--Harout72 (talk) 15:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antony Costa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Duncan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

forging citations[edit]

Your use of bad citations is getting ridiculous. This forged citation, where you provide an archive of the chartbusters.it blog and falsely claim that it is a citation to the Musica e Dischi site, is a near perfect copy of this forged citation. I don't know where the root of this problem but I do know this: the next time I see you inserting a false or forged citation, you will be blocked. Again. I've tolerated your resumption of editing despite the long-ago block on your User:Ingrid Rodrigues account, but this kind of intentional bad edit leaves me uninclined to continue to turn a blind eye.—Kww(talk) 03:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot copy a reference from one article to another without checking it out yourself. Providing a citation is a statement from you that you have checked things out. There's no way you can claim that you accidentally posted a cite to a fan forum and just wrote that it was from an official music site without it being your fault. Reporting an administrator for giving you a warning probably won't get you very far. You get a lot of warnings from me because you male a lot of bad edits without ever quite crossing into vandalism. I'm done though. Like I said, one more case of that kind of behaviour, and your block will be reinstated.—Kww(talk) 03:57, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. User was originally blocked as User:Ingrid Rodrigues and has been evading that block for some time. The Ingrid Rodrigues account was blocked for constant use of bad charts and dubious citations, and the level of problem that "Stephanie J Stone" has with the same issues means that this cannot fall under WP:CLEANSTART. The last edit after warning was this, which used a fansite about Bridgit Mendler to add information to an article about Olivia Holt. Not only has the editor been warned several times about blogs and fansites, this time she couldn't even manage to insert something that the fansite actually said.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kww(talk) 19:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stephanie J Stone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is absurd. I've always been a great publisher. Sometimes used unknown sources, but no one told me anything, right and wrong. I have years of editions and I did a lot of the good articles. People vandalized truthful information I published lately. And I don't know who is Ingrid Rodrigues. Computers are sold. Unblock me

Decline reason:

As far as I can tell, you're either evading a block on your other account, or not competent enough to avoid the disruptive editing that Ingrid Rodrigues was blocked for and that you've been warned about multiple times above. Either way, unblocking you is a no win for the encyclopedia. Danger High voltage! 18:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I can't deny this unblock since I'm the blocking admin, but for this user to claim she has never been warned is absurd, as a quick scan of this talk page shows. She edits from the same IP range as Ingrid Rodrigues (see the autoblock problems above: the bug was that the autoblock was reasserted, not that it got the IP addresses wrong). The overlap of the two editors on Spice Girls related topics pretty compelling, especially when you combine it with such varied topics as Lindsay Lohan, Kelly Key, and Tin Tin Out. The sockpuppeting business has continued recently with User:Sarah Marie T., whose first edit was to add a complex citation to Ready or Not (Bridgit Mendler song) a couple of hours after I warned Stephanie J Stone about dubious citations to Bridgit Mendler articles. Given Ingrid's Brazilian background, it's not surprising that Sarah Marie T. is also interested in the Portuguese popularity of Brigit Mendler.—Kww(talk) 18:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Category:McClain Sisters[edit]

Category:McClain Sisters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:McClain Sisters - Go.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:McClain Sisters - Go.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stephanie J Stone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have good posts and I am here for years. I get confused with links, but I apologize. I am a good editor, see my publications (Debby Ryan, Bridgit Mendler, Zendaya, Blue band, Rachel Stevens)

Decline reason:

The evidence posted by the blocking admin is pretty compelling. Not that you addresses it one bit. If you keep posting unblock requests avoiding the issue entirely I would strongly recommend to the next reviewing admin that your talk page access be revoked for wasting our time. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Girlfriend in a Coma (TV series) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Girlfriend in a Coma (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girlfriend in a Coma (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Babar Suhail (talk) 14:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heard It on the Radio for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heard It on the Radio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heard It on the Radio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:13, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ross Lynch - Can You Feel It.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ross Lynch - Can You Feel It.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:27, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bridgit Mendler: Live in Concert for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bridgit Mendler: Live in Concert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgit Mendler: Live in Concert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 01:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Girlfriend in a Coma (TV series) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Girlfriend in a Coma (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girlfriend in a Coma (TV series) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Babar Suhail (talk) 19:42, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bridgit Mendler - Hurricane (promotional single).png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bridgit Mendler - Hurricane (promotional single).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Make Your Mark Ultimate Playlist.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Make Your Mark Ultimate Playlist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hurricane - Bridgit Mendler.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hurricane - Bridgit Mendler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zendaya DVD Behind the Scenes.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zendaya DVD Behind the Scenes.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ross Lynch - A Billion Hits.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ross Lynch - A Billion Hits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ross Lynch - Heard it on the Radio.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ross Lynch - Heard it on the Radio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Radio Rebel soundtrack.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Radio Rebel soundtrack.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DBZFan30 (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Radio Disney Music Awards.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Radio Disney Music Awards.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:51, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:16 Wishes soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free movie album cover being used in WP:DECORATIVE manner in 16 Wishes#Soundtrack. Non-free cover art for movie soundtrack albums can be used for primary identification purposes in the main infobox or at the top of stand-alone articles about album in question, but they are pretty much never allowed to be used in subsections of articles about the corresponding film per WP:NFCC#8, WP:NFC#cite_note-3 or WP:FILMSCORE, unless the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary to provide the context required for non-free use. That's not the case with this file, so there's no way to justify its non-free use per WP:NFCCP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Alice Upside Down soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Alice Upside Down#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:McClain Sisters[edit]

Template:McClain Sisters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 10:51, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Debby Ryan has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Debby Ryan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 12:44, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miranda Cosgrove - Summer Tour.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miranda Cosgrove - Summer Tour.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Swag It Out by Zendaya.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Swag It Out by Zendaya.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ali Lohan[edit]

Template:Ali Lohan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 23:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Debby Ryan - We Got the Beat.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Debby Ryan - We Got the Beat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Debby Ryan - Made of Matches.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Debby Ryan - Made of Matches.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]