Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trak Only

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trak Only[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, supported only by a press release sourced to an otherwise RS. Would speedy this but wanted this to be an example of how press releases in India are being used for RS, currently in discussion over at the RS noticeboard. Oaktree b (talk) 13:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 13:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability. Qcne (talk) 13:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:49, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Only source I found that would come close to WP:ORGCRIT was from The Telegraphy but upon closer examination is a sponsored post.--CNMall41 (talk) 17:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - coverage mainly seems to be press releases as noted above, https://sportsmintmedia.com/tamil-thalaivas-prolong-association-with-trak-only-as-kit-partner/ might be independent though. - Indefensible (talk) 06:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.