Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temple Stadium (proposed)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 18:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temple Stadium (proposed)[edit]

Temple Stadium (proposed) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:CRYSTAL this proposed stadium does not merit its own article. It has only been proposed in preliminary fashion once, and that proposal was rejected by the city. Since the university has since moved on to talks about using someone else's stadium, the proposed stadium is now a mere conjecture and can be categorized as "product announcements and rumors" in rule #5 at WP:CRYSTAL. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:08, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A hypothetical concept should be further along in the process for notability, per CRYSTAL. Reywas92Talk 22:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, and also noting that currently about a third of the article's content is not about the subject. signed, Rosguill talk 00:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.