Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T. J. Syner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

T. J. Syner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with a bunch of WP:ROUTINE sources about signings and such. Fails WP:NHOCKEY by not playing in high enough covered leagues to presume notability and no major individual awards. Yosemiter (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this person does not meet any of the criteria listed at WP:NHOCKEY. 331dot (talk) 19:09, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The product of an editor who ultimately received a community ban on new article creation for the many hundreds of NN articles (often in open defiance of both community consensus and appropriate notability guidelines) made to bump up his page creation count. As with the vast majority of these articles, the subject here is a journeyman hockey player in the minors with an undistinguished career and no awards, noteworthy or otherwise. Ravenswing 04:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Not finding significant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 13:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.