Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slaheddine Fessi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep The nominator requested to withdraw. Govvy (talk) 09:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slaheddine Fessi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

i don't believe this player meets GNG or SPORTCRIT. I can find no coverage or details on this player/ MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Sports, Football, Olympics, and Tunisia. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 20:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Mm, I'm not convinced the article should go. Fessi spent 14 years at Club Africain, one of the largest clubs in Tunisia, winning three league championships there. I also found these articles about Fessi: [1], [2], [3]? What do you make of them, MarchOfTheGreyhounds? Robby.is.on (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding those! Perhaps I missed them due to them being in French? At first glance, they appear to be excellent sources that would see him easily pass GNG. I'll wait for someone else to confirm they're good sources, then withdraw the nomination if appropriate. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 21:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - has in-depth coverage from two different reputable news sources so looks to meet WP:GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment withdraw my nomination as per above. --MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 21:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I had to double-check, as it's early in the UK as of typing this! I thought you'd nominated this version of the article, but that's the post-nom version, per the excellent expansion work from Robby. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 03:52, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.