Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Gary Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 09:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roland Gary Jones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find sources through Google to support notability of this person under WP:BIO or WP:GNG. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, also, the page reads like a resume/self-promotion. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I forgot to note the apparent conflict of interest, based on the name of the creating user. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just another lawyer, this time with a published book. Spammy, but with no real indications of notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable.Tazerdadog (talk) 20:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Promotional article created by a WP:SPA Jonesandassociates fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 00:05, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional and created by a SPA with a COI. Northern Antarctica ₵ 01:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.