Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nile Eagle FC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Please move reliable sources from this discussion into the article now that the consensus is to Keep the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nile Eagle FC[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, fails GNG and NORG, no sources with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth. // Timothy :: talk 15:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Africa. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Keep Not unsourced, the source is the RSSSF reference in external links. I was expecting to find nothing at all on this club considering South Sudan is one of the most poorly covered football countries in the world and doesn't even really have a national league - just a cup for regional winners. There's also lots of coverage on Facebook, which seems odd, but it appears the local South Sudanese media groups actually just use Facebook as a website. If not kept, should definitely be merged somewhere so we don't lose the information, even though it's not much at the moment. Non-Facebook sources include: [1] [2] and not GNG: [3] SportingFlyer T·C 20:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per SportingFlyer. Competed in SOuth Sudanese top flight ([4]) and has sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve as above. Giant Snowman 12:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.