Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mampuzha Madhava Panicker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Consensus about insufficient sourcing for this BIO includes even the Keep view. Owen× ☎ 01:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mampuzha Madhava Panicker[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find evidence that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG, though as I can only read English, I may be missing something. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now get this resolved. Boleyn (talk) 17:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance and India. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 18:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - insufficiently sourced, but Kathakali dance is an important South Indian classical dance form revived in the early to mid 20th century and winning the Sangeet Natak Akademi Award is a big deal. I think it would be a mistake to delete this biographical information, which is not duplicated in any other language on WP. Llajwa (talk) 20:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. Normally at least leads can be found on at least one other lang wiki but here nothing. Ping me if sources are found, I'm open to a redirect if sources can be found showing that the redirect is appropriate. // Timothy :: talk 18:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.