Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of landlocked U.S. states (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of landlocked U.S. states

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is WP:TRIVIA plain and simple. It is WP:OR that can quickly be deduced from looking at a map. The one "source" cited is laughable. It clearly indicates a WP:GNG fail. It is mentioned once that Nebraska is triply landlocked. Just because a Senate press release mentions this, does not mean that the article is notable. I-82-I | TALK 03:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. I-82-I | TALK 03:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:LISTN. The distinction is significant for countries, which have to export their goods to take advantage of maritime shipping, but for American states, not so much. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Yes, this is WP:TRIVIA. A really unimportant topic which can be sorted by looking at a map, as the nom suggests. -- Whiteguru (talk) 12:49, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I wouldn't call an indisputably verifiable fact OR, but it is not encyclopedic. — Charles Stewart (talk) 13:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per Cunard's fine work on the last AfD in 2018, which I hereby incorporate by reference. I believe the reason this article has existed for over 11 years is because it is useful to our readers and appropriate content.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 16:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being multiply landlocked is a meaningless triviality. We don't need articles to put in lists anything that can be ascertained by a map. Sources pointing out that particular states are landlocked doesn't need a list to collate that. Reywas92^Talk 18:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure trivia. The distinction of US states being "landlocked" serves little to no purpose, as compared to actual countries. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 23:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Trivia. Unsourced and probably WP:OR. In addition, the list is incorrect as states like Michigan have been served by ocean-going ships via the St. Lawrence Seaway. Cxbrx (talk) 11:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP I agree with Milowent. Cunard's sources prove this is clearly notable. [1] Dream Focus 00:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Is WP:TRIVIA, fails WP:LISTN. The comparable article about countries contains information not easily understood by looking at a map, and is is a significance because of the issue of trade. This on the other hand meets WP:NOTEVERYTHING // Timothy :: talk 03:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Trivia, as noted by others. Land-locked nations is a notable topic for historical, trade, etc...reasons. Articles like this are evidence of the English Wikipedia being too Ameri-centric. Zaathras (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.