Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Tunisian throne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Tunisian throne

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This kingdom has been defunct since 1957. This technically unsourced article looks like unverifiable original research, including about the supposed royal status of living persons (WP:BLP). See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne for a similar case. Norden1990 (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Norden1990 (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Norden1990 (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:DEL-REASON 6: Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to the Tunisian throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the monarchy doesn't exist anymore. TompaDompa (talk) 23:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and TompaDompa. The article does not cite RS and I don't believe this could be verifiably sourced and not contain substantial WP:OR | WP:SYNTH. // Timothy :: talk 07:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not supposed to be a genealogical database for deposed royal families.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At least this article doesn't seem to insert all the potential successors born after 1957; on the other hand, since it states the succession rules are currently being observed, it implies information on more recent heirs couldn't even be found by Christopher Buyers. JoelleJay (talk) 23:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the other comment above. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:57, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- per above all. Sv72 (talk) 09:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 11:32, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, WP:SNOW, and WP:LIST. I want to add in that not only is Tunisia extremely unlikely to become a monarchy again, all of the heirs in the article are elderly and the succession might die out soon. More remote heirs might not be notable. Bearian (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.