Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Haynie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Haynie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another editor's PROD was removed and a single source was added. So, the next step is --- does this guy meet the requirements for an article? Kellymoat (talk) 16:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Actor with minor roles only. Does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 05:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:12, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no demonstration of multiple significant roles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.