Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremiah Thoronka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In reaching this conclusion, I considered the strength of the arguments as well as looking at the references offered in support of notability. The sourcing appears to clearly fall below expected standards. While there were numerically more editors arguing for keeping the article, their arguments overall were not as well supported. There were also an unusually high number of editors with limited experience in this discussion. Of the keep !voters all but 2 had fewer than 52 edits, and were editing AfD for the first time. To the extent these votes were less policy compliant, they were weighted less. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 03:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremiah Thoronka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Flowery text, person not meeting GNG or BLP. Article is unclear as to what the person does, appears to be a student. Vaguely promo. Oaktree b (talk) 21:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All of the references are non-notable websites. They could all be run by his mum, frankly. MNewnham (talk) 01:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a non notable website [[1]], [[2]], [[3]], [[4]] a non notable website? Please check notable newspaper. All the references used are independent secondary reliable sources with a significant coverage. 105.112.227.4 (talk) 16:06, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Africa. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep [[5]], [[6]], [[7]], [[8]] and [[9]] are enough to establish notability. Beside that, his researched on sociocultural and technical energy efficiency issues can't be overemphasize.He founded Optim Energy, a start-up that explored piezoelectricity to generate clean and affordable energy for those most vulnerable in society which he actually contribute emmensely to the science and technology. This article has pass WP:GNP 105.112.227.4 (talk) 16:54, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SIGCOV. In 2007, this sort of "rising young star" page would have been kept, but we've long been explicitly more difficult. Bearian (talk) 15:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This has passed WP:SIGCOV as there numerous like young rising star that have page. This could be because maybe he's black that's why you are saying so. A young scientist with significant coverage from reliable sources such as BBC, scientific Magazines 105.112.115.109 (talk) 17:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
keep It has pass WP:GNP as all the sources are secondary independent sources. Edwiedxx (talk) 19:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per some thought and explaination this article has pass general notability WP:GNP. There's project to include young scholar and researcher and this article has generally connect with it. Again [10] and [11] only can assist to pass WP:GNP. Hammidh44 (talk) 11:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why the delete! It clearly proves WP:GNG and WP:NEXIST, also per the rationale provided by the users above. An@ss_koko^{(speak up)} 18:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources clearly exist as demonstrated by IP. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 13:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It has clearly pass WP:SIGCOV. Nasawakenan (talk) 9:07, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Delete fails WP:GNG ABHammad (talk) 04:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It has pass General notability of a living person as well as his scientific research and discovery. Dogarawa (talk) 09:56,29 March 2023 (UTC)
Keep Google result gives multiple reliable sources which can establish notability. So it pass WP:NEXIST Zamujene (talk) 17:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.