Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Bridewell
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. The article was significantly improved and I now believe the subject is notable. (non-admin closure) Hey man im josh (talk) 14:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jeff Bridewell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet WP:NSPORTS. Drafted to the NFL in the 12th round in 1991 but failed to ever make the roster. He was signed by an NFL Europe team, but never took the field for them either. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Withdrawn by nominator. The article has been improved a great deal by BeanieFan11 and it's a clear WP:SNOW. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Sports, and American football. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems to meet GNG with Newspapers.com coverage: It's bombs away for UC Davis (p2) from The Napa Valley Register; Bridewell trying to stick as Packers' 'other' QB from the Green Bay Press-Gazette; Jeff Bridewell (p2) from the first; Bridewell named to all-star game (p2) from the first; and Bridewell running out of patience with NFL (p2) from The Sacramento Bee. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. I added references mentioned above and expanded the article from its previous state to meet the requirements.Thetreesarespeakingtome (talk) 21:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep passes WP:SPORTCRIT with WP:SIGCOV Bruxton (talk) 21:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep looks like additional entries have met WP:N.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per BeanieFan11's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 11:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.