Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibraah (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ibraah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possible covert UPE on a Borderline G4 eligible article where the subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. The only dubious change from the previous deleted one and this, is that the artist has been signed to a non notable record label just established in 2020. A WP:BEFORE on subject of our discussion, which you could perform as well just shows how blatantly non notable he is. Other hits are in press releases as well as mere announcements. This is still a case of WP:TOOSOON as it was previously. Celestina007 (talk) 14:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Konde Music Worldwide is not an unknown record label and Ibraah is not blatantly non notable. Konde Music Worldwide is a big Record label in the East African region (and that SHOULD matter) and Ibraah is too. The region should not be underlooked like that. I'm not convinced it's too soon either as the artist has 1 million followers on Instagram and a whooping 17 million views on YouTube.PushaWasha (talk) 15:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — You are the creator of the article so please don’t sound as though you are an objective editor. Please prove it via reliable sources how the subject of your article satisfies WP:GNG. Bring to this AFD any reliable source to substantiate your claim that they are notable. Furthermore please cease and desist from UPE and sockpuppetry, I’ve left a message on your tp, upon closer examination it appears GeneralizationsAreBad already warned you about UPE and sockpuppetry. Celestina007 (talk) 15:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - ok then. you can delete it if you want. I don't really care no mo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PushaWasha (talk • contribs) 16:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom, fails WP:NMUSICBIO, perhaps indeed WP:TOOSOON CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:49, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete: can't find any sources, but it's plausible that some could exist and I'm not an expert in Tanzanian sources. However, given the context of the creation and the UPE/sockpuppetry, and the fact that there's no concrete evidence of GNG being met, I'm inclined towards deletion. — Bilorv (talk) 19:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Ibraah Biography, Age, Education, Album, Songs, Girlfriend, Net Worth" and "Ibraah Biography, Age, Education, Album, Songs, Girlfriend, Net Worth" (yes, two refs with that same title) are not usable sources. The majority of these are download pages for the album. The Cyclone Times article is a passing mention of him quoted in an Instagram post. The only thing that seems like it even comes close to WP:SIGCOV is this one, but it seems fairly questionable in terms of being an independent RS. jp×g 03:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per CommanderWaterford. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 05:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.