Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethiopia national under-17 football team

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 01:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ethiopia national under-17 football team[edit]

Ethiopia national under-17 football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSPORT and has no notability shown AmericanAir88(talk) 22:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I would have thought that a national team is notable. There should be coverage on the team, and there is - [1][2][3][4][5], this is before you get to the local language of the country. It should qualify under WP:GNG (WP:NSPORT does not actually cover teams except for a few individual sports, see WP:NTEAM, but perhaps it should, as I think nominations such as this are unnecessary). Hzh (talk) 11:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per sources by Hzh. Nominator should have done a better search WP:BEFORE nominating, notability of the GNG is based on what exists, not based on the current sourcing in the article. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 23:54, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 14:13, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - per Hzh, although article needs some serious improving. Inter&anthro (talk) 13:56, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per Hzh, although the article needs a lot of work. 21.colinthompson (talk) 01:54, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Clearly notable as a national team and per GNG. Smartyllama (talk) 19:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.