Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Turkey, Singapore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Singapore–Turkey relations. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Turkey, Singapore[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Sources in article are statements from the embassy, and do not address the subject - the embassy. BEFORE showed statements from the embassy, but nothing about the embassy itself from independent reliable sources.

No objection to redirects to List of diplomatic missions of Turkey. // Timothy :: talk 01:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep both per WP:IAR. It's an embassy, we should certainly keep it. Otherwise, I would be fine with a Draftify result. QuicoleJR (talk) 01:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Singapore, and Turkey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both Embassies are not inherently notable. No significant independent sources to meet GNG. LibStar (talk) 09:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both: No need to say "What about other embassies of Turkey". CastJared (talk) 13:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Following with GNG, Embassy of the United States, Asmara should be deleted as well. However the article stands to this day. Katakana546 (talk) 13:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, these articles should be held to the same standard. // Timothy :: talk 13:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already nominated, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Asmara. CastJared (talk) 13:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. See what I wrote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Asmara. Embassies are usually the subject of coverage by reliable sources, but you may have to use Google Translate and offline sources to find those references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Singapore–Turkey relations: Related content. – robertsky (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a decision? CastJared (talk) 08:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's my opinion. People will search for Turkey embassy in Singapore. A redirect to a similar content, in this case to the relations page, should suffice as a navigation aid for those who wants to know more about Turkey diplomatic relationship with Singapore. – robertsky (talk) 08:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the page for the bilateral relations for the Singapore embassy. Certainly there has been extensive coverage of an early Turkish consulate in Singapore (see this) but this does not appear to be in continuity with the modern embassy, for which there is no SIGCOV. The bilateral relations article is a good place to keep this. Note that this should have been two separate AfDs. --GGT (talk) 20:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per WP:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United States, Asmara. Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 02:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This fails WP:GNG, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. CastJared (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.