Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Galvan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Galvan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was created solely to support a lanugishing nomination at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates [1]

Delete The subject is a criminal who has no notability other than his re-arrest after release due to a clerical error. A simultaneous stub article was created at 2013 Moroccan protests which which has been nominated for merger. Neither stub stands on its own with content or notability.

Note that the !vote above is made by the nominator of this AfD,--BabbaQ (talk) 21:29, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. BabbaQ (talk) 21:35, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as creator. There were a number of users that wanted an article made so I just simply made this stub. Anyway, I think this is highly notable actually as this guy is the reason to why national protests errupted in Morocco. WP:GNG should cover this basically.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 August 7. Snotbot t • c » 22:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. People asking for an article isn't a valid reason to create one. I shudder to imagine all the Bieber-related ones we'd have if that were so. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You comparing this articles subject with Justin Bieber making me think you do not understand its content? :) And yes to ask for creation of a potentially important event of a national level is valid. --BabbaQ (talk) 23:59, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can we avoid the personal comments? Your effort is appreciated, but the material just doesn't support the article. It happens. μηδείς (talk) 00:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who is making this personal? Comparing Justin to a subject of a spanish paedophile and the protests he caused is just a very weak argument and I only commented on it to make a point. As we are on different sides of this discussion I would appreciate it if you took this less personal and more factual. A AfD is not to be won, it is to be discussed and discussions often have different opinions involved.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:23, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't take this personally. Neither I nor Clarityfiend mentioned you in our comments, yet you felt it necessary to warn administrators that I was the editor of my own comments and you referred directly to Clarityfiend and his supposed lack of understanding. None of that is called for; none of us is against you; please confine your comments to the merit of the article. μηδείς (talk) 01:12, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You say dont take it personally, but still you manage to add insults into every comment you make towards me. I do not know how that add up. If you take an AfD that personally I suggest you do not make AfDs until you are ready to take that other users can have different opinions then you. AfDs are as I said made to get alot of different opinions and if I want to refute a claim made by another user within the context of an AfD that should be OK even if you take it personal. Please move on and stop having personal disputes on a AfD.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The person is simply not notable. T C N7JM 10:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

neutral wouldn't mind a redirect a to the protests page.Lihaas (talk) 10:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (or redirect if 2013 Moroccan protests passes AfD). Not notable individual. The protests may or may not be notable: they have received some international coverage, but no indication of lasting impact, but they have a separate article anyway: 2013 Moroccan protests. Paedophile hysteria seems to be a national sport in certain nations, but just because people get hysterical over something doesn't mean we should cover it (there's your Bieber comparison). --10:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Delete, fails WP:GNG, could be redirected to 2013 Moroccan protests. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability $Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...)$ 10:14, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.