Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commandery of fezzan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . ✗plicit 23:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commandery of fezzan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject (the administration) directly and indepth. Even if minimal sourcing could be found this is a CFORK with no legitimate rationale for spliting content. No objection if there is a consensus for a redirect to Karamanli dynasty, but there is no properly sourced material to merge.

Drafting was rejected. // Timothy :: talk 23:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Africa, and Libya. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The article is some kind of SYNTH. Mccapra (talk) 08:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth sourcing to meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Fezzan or Fezzan Province, under history. Or delete. Bearian (talk) 17:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG I believe. Equine-man (talk) 14:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (possibly just redirect) probably to Fezzan Province. That is not the ideal solution, but there is too little content to merit keeping, unless rapidly expanded. The present text does not even give a date for Ottoman conquest. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - We do not have enough existing in-depth RS. Lightburst (talk) 18:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.