Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Campbell (diplomat)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Campbell (diplomat)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. I believe the fairly routine coverage fails WP:GNG. Uhooep (talk) 20:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Bilateral relations, United Kingdom, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, and Nicaragua. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I've updated and added some references just now. I'd say that the spread of sources is enough to show significant coverage, and are non-trivial enough to show notability. Additionally, on a non-policy point I personally don't think it serves Wikipedia to delete the article of a three-time ambassador. Gazamp (talk) 17:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Article sources are not WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, BEFORE showed mentions, but nothing SIGCOV about the subject that is from an WP:IS.

Source eval:

Comments	Source
Interview, not WP:IS	1. "Departing British ambassadors reflect on four-year tenure in Costa Rica". The Tico Times. 23 May 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2020.
from employer, not WP:IS	2. ^ "Change of Ambassador to the Republic of Ecuador - November 2020". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
Named in list, no SIGCOV	3. ^ Jump up to:a b "El Gobierno Nacional pagó USD 285 millones a proveedores del Estado – Secretaría General de Comunicación de la Presidencia". www.comunicacion.gob.ec. Retrieved 14 October 2020.
from employer, not WP:IS	4. ^ "Change of Her Majesty's Ambassador to the Dominican Republic". WiredGov. 21 April 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2020.
from employer, not WP:IS	5. ^ Jump up to:a b "Chris Campbell - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
Interview, not WP:IS	6. ^ Jump up to:a b c Adewunmi, Bim (3 July 2011). "A very diplomatic marriage". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
Government notice about his spouse, name drop for subject, not SIGCOV	7. ^ "Appointment: Ambassador to Costa Rica and Non Resident Ambassador to Nicaragua". The Times. 25 June 2011. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
Interview, not WP:IS	8. ^ Dolores Vicioso (4 February 2020). "Ambassador Chris Campbell says Brexit opens opportunities for UK and DR". DR1.com. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
Interview, not WP:IS	9. ^ "Interview with Chris Campbell, HM Ambassador to Ecuador". LatAm Investor. 7 January 2021. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
Interview, not WP:IS	10. ^ "Special report: Ecuador is back on the map" (PDF). British Ecuadorian Society. LatAm Investor. pp. 32–33. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
Namedrop, no SIGCOV	11. ^ "UK Foreign Office Eases Travel Warnings for Ecuador". Northern Ireland Travel News. 11 July 2022. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
Namedrop, no SIGCOV	12. ^ Chris Moss (22 September 2021). "It is beginning to feel like we may never visit Latin America again". The Telegraph. Retrieved 28 October 2023.
Namedrop, no SIGCOV	13. ^ "Live updates: Charles back in London as king; queen mourned". The San Diego Union-Tribune. 9 September 2022. Retrieved 28 October 2023.

Nothing meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from an independent source. // Timothy :: talk 09:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Referenced, notable, no reason to delete it. it should not have been nominated for deletion. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 13:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Notable under which notability criteria exactly? Uhooep (talk) 14:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as it has good sources and he is notable as well. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:59, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are 13+ sources and they are reliable. बिनोद थारू (talk) 02:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.