Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007–08 Dynamo Dresden season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 20:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2007–08 Dynamo Dresden season[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

General consensus states that all football club season articles should be about a professional football season to be considered notable. Fully professional leagues are listed at WP:FPL. In this season, Dynamo Dresden were in the Regionalliga, the third tier at the time, which is not listed as a fully professional league, and therefore not notable, per WP:NSEASONS. A similar discussion involving Rot-Weiß Oberhausen can be seen at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 SC Paderborn 07 season. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 03:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NSEASONS. Number 5 7 08:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 01:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 01:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 01:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this is the season that the club qualified for the 3. Liga, it is clearly notable in the contet of the club's history and deserves to stand alone as an article. Inter&anthro (talk) 20:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- This season (2015–16) has seen my club reach it's highest ever points total (105) and achieve promotion to the highest level it's ever played at, so it's clearly notable in the context of it's history too. However, that's not a valid reason for it to have a season article. Number 5 7 21:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as still questionable for notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 05:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clear WP:NSEASONS failure, in no way would this be considered a season for a club in a top professional league. WP:NOTSTATS concerns as well. Fenix down (talk) 08:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.