Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 Park Avenue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1 Park Avenue[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Canceled building with no clear evidence of notability. The first source is not significant coverage. The second source is not independent. The third is dead and even the archive is broken. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Park Avenue (about a different building), which concluded neither was notable. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hey man im josh: Shouldn't this be in United Arab Emirates not Saudi Arabia? * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, definitely should be @Pppery. Thanks for catching this mistake, I must have misclicked in the drop down for middle eastern countries. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not finding significant coverage in reliable independent sources via Wikipedia Library (where I would expect to see coverage about developments like this one), although it is mentioned in articles about 1 Dubai and Jumeirah Garden City. IMO, doesn't warrant a redirect, either, given that there are many other properties around the world with the same name that are possibly more "notable" in the Wikipedia sense. Cielquiparle (talk) 14:10, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, isn't notable enough to pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 09:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.