Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1947 Triangulaire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Triangulaire. Content can be merged from the history.  Sandstein  21:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1947 Triangulaire[edit]

1947 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable sports event. Fails WP:Sports event Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC) Adding the follwing for the same reasons:[reply]

1948 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1949 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1950 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1951 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1952 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1953 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1954 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1955 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1956 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1957 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1958 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
1963 Triangulaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Merge - since result tables are so small, they can be easily merged into the main article. Renata (talk) 23:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to main article. Perfectly reasonable to keep this level of detail on the main topic. SFB 00:49, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 10:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - individual season articles for this level of football are not notable. GiantSnowman 12:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - With a non-FIFA member taking part, I am doubtful any of these matches count as official tier 1 games and with no sourced prose to back up the results, this seems like a clear violation of WP:NOTSTATS for a very minor regional competition. Fenix down (talk) 16:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all - from the evidence available, this seems to be a minor competition Spiderone 11:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all, seeing as the results and winners already exist in the Triangulaire article, no merging necessary. Laurdecl talk 08:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Merge on second thought. While the Triangulaire article has the winners, it does not have an individual goal tally, which could easily be added. It would be a shame for this information to be deleted when it could so easily be in the main article. Laurdecl talk 08:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.